• Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    No, because we live in a global society where if you don’t participate in global trade (especially with the USA in the past couple hundred years), your country will fail.

    The USA has played a massive part in making communist experiments fail, most notibly the USSR.

    The closest thing that the western world has is the nordic countries’ social democracy, which is still capitalist by nature. They only implemented it, though due to communism being literally right around the corner (USSR)

    • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t think you can get to communism where there’s a relatively small group in power tasked with dividing the means of production. That power will be abused like oligarchs do now.

      • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, I agree with that. Mass centralization is bad regardless of the situation IMO. We need collaboration instead.

        I’m personally a fan of Prof Wolff’s idea to force all corporations to surrender ownership to their workers, converting them into worker-owned coops. This would largely mitigate the ability for extreme wealth concentration to happen to begin with, especially if combined with other wealth-limiting regulations.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m sure fighting a global proxy war for most of a century has absolutely nothing to do with the (state) failure of the USSR.

        Now, excuse me, I have to go to the ER because of all the compounded brain damage it takes to both think that and say anyone that believes otherwise is a tankie.