Summary
JD Vance argued that courts cannot overrule Trump’s executive orders, likening judicial interference to an illegal overreach.
Critics, including lawmakers and legal experts, denounced his claims as unconstitutional.
This debate follows recent federal rulings blocking Trump’s executive actions, including spending freezes and an order ending birthright citizenship.
Opposition figures warned against undermining the judiciary, emphasizing checks and balances.
COVID taught us that even two weeks of reduced profits was enough to send a lot of these companies spinning.
We could literally end this in a month with a general strike, but we’ll never get enough citizens on board with it.