fossilesque@mander.xyzcakeM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1358arrow-down12
arrow-up1356arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzcakeM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squaremagnetosphere@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·1 month agoThis is “nuke the hurricane”-level science.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 month agoNo, absolutely not. This is increasing the surface area and availability of rocks that take up CO2.
minus-squaremagnetosphere@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoBy “level”, I’m talking about the practicality and wisdom of the idea.
This is “nuke the hurricane”-level science.
No, absolutely not. This is increasing the surface area and availability of rocks that take up CO2.
By “level”, I’m talking about the practicality and wisdom of the idea.
It is not comparable.