• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    the fucked up thing is that it’s almost true, there’s a level of wealth where people are generally optimally happy. Look at people who get enough money to buy a house and comfortably retire early on without needing to worry about affording normal things again, something like that is peak contentment in life.

    I sincerely do not understand why a mentally healthy person would ever want a to be richer than that, it means you have to do a bunch of publicity shit and other miserable stuff and it doesn’t really benefit you much.

    • benjaminb@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think another important factor is how famous you are. I’d imagine it’s really annoying to get recognised anywhere you go…

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        unless of course you’re like mrbeast or the muskrat who seem to love the attention and in fact crave the constant validation of being recognized.

    • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Broken people can’t afford a house… they are happy if they get through the month with ±0.

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    This feels like its taken out of context

    But he also said dumb things like the youtube algorithm being perfect so maybe its not taken out of context

  • wisely@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Life is much simpler being a regular middle class kid living with your parents than an adult millionaire everyone knows and expects money from. He never knew what actually being broke and responsible for yourself or a family as an adult was.

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Even if it’s not about other people expecting money, people adjust their lifestyle to their money, even when it causes them to be 10 times as busy as a result. Suddenly you’re managing your house cleaner, your cook, you have contractors at your house every week, you decide you need more things, that all need maintenance, you’re constantly managing people. One day you look at that and think, why do I always have so much on my plate when I’m so rich.

      If people simplified their lives at the same time they became rich, they would be much happier, imo.

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Exactly this. When he was 'broke ’ he was just a kid and couldn’t by a Lambo because he was bored. Now he has an amount of money that requires responsibility, so much so that professionals are required to handle it. Sooo stressful.

      He doesn’t know what Broke is. Honestly, most people that say they are don’t.

      I doubt he’s ever had to pass on brunch so he wouldn’t have to worry about his check to the gas company bouncing.

      Never had to pawn his stereo to cover rent so his girlfriend wouldn’t finally kick him out.

      Never had to calculate whether the bus fare to and from the plasma clinic was actually worth the trip for a donation.

  • finkrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    He could sell all his assets, purchase a middle class house in cash, and probably retire and have absolutely nothing to do if he wanted to and be set for life

    This guy can go fuck himself

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The petite bourgeoisie is/was real. Not sure if it’s the same thing as what people refer to as “middle class,” but it is a separate “class” of people who’s interests mostly lie with the proletariat, yet their small business or whatever makes them believe and act as though they’re part of the owner class.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          it is a separate “class” of people who’s interests mostly lie with the proletariat, yet their small business or whatever makes them believe and act as though they’re part of the owner class.

          We are saying the same thing. It is a con the ruling class run on us to make us betray our interests. It’s a lie we tell ourselves because we don’t want to believe we’re in the “lowest” class. It’s a wedge intending to cleave our solidarity.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          The merchant class was certainly a thing after the black plague.

          They had enough wealth that they had political influence.

          • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            here in sweden at least we specifically had 4 classes around that time: Nobility, priests, bourgeoise/merchants, and farmers. Bougies were defined by being allowed to run businesses in cities, as farmers in sweden largely kept to themselves outside of cities and basically only interacted with the other classes during specific occasions like selling/buying things in the city or doing legal stuff or more significant religious things.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s a strata of workers in the imperial core that are elevated above other workers by the distribution of superprofits. A white collar supervisor isn’t bourgeois, but they aren’t proletarian either. Hence, middle class.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          That white collar supervisor is part of the proletarian. They are selling their labor to make a living.

          You’re right about stratification of society based on income when it comes to us proles though. Some of us have nicer toys and living places but we still need to work to survive unlike the bourgeois that make their money by capital investment (ie: they make more money with the money they have and don’t actually need to labor).

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            That supervisor has a distinct relationship with the means of production compared with other workers. His job (you’ll notice this strata of workers are almost always white men) is to extract the surplus value from other actual workers, and because of this he is actually being paid the full value of his labor. This makes his class position distinct from other workers.

            That’s why you don’t tell the supervisor about the union until it’s too late for him to stop you.

            • LePoisson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Yeah I hear you I’m just saying those dudes are part of the proles and you need necessary to buy in from them in an organization for anything to really change.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                They’re bourgeoisified by their relationship to the means of production. They are paid the full value of their labor through bonuses and high wages and stock option, they don’t need unions and we don’t need them.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Middle-class didn’t even used to be defined by wealth, it was the class of people who worked for themselves, so anyone from a blacksmith to a doctor, tradesman to professional. The idea was that they didn’t have a “boss” to report to, do they were more free to speak thier mind.

  • BillWigly@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    if it’s so much easier then just give away every penny why dontcha? oh he only ‘gives’ for content

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 day ago

    Real “Marie Antoinette having an entire fake rustic village built to pretend to be a peasant for a day” energy.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Honestly less relatable even than that. At least Marie Antoinette had very little contact to the outside world, so her sheltered life makes sense. Mr. Beast has no such excuse.

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even if I were being charitable to say what he meant was not being famous is easier, it’s still such a backhanded remark to make - I’d rather deal with the problems of fame than the looming threat of the poverty line any day of the week.

    • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The thing is, in this age, fame is a choice (to those it is given to). He has enough money to retire into obscurity, living a simple life of comfort. He chooses not not to.

    • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      What he means is it would be a lot easier for him to have adult conversations with underage children on the internet if everyone wasn’t always watching him. How’s he going to buy and hang cartoon CP on the walls if he’s poor though?

    • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where I’m from, if you’re evicted at any time during the 9-10 months of winter you’ll probably die unless you find another place in time which can be incredibly difficult and risky depending on why you were evicted.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Learning about idol scenes and how hardcore it is to be an idol makes me feel very uncomfortable, but I somehow find Mr Beast to be a fish worth this ocean. He’s somehow uniquely compatible with what youtube wants now, and I doubt it’s stirs him wrong. In my mind, he echoes what other creators feel about all that bs.

  • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well you know what they say: mo money, mo problems.

    Which can be extrapolated to no money, no problems. Right?

    Right???