• NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    British tech has always been about weirdos in sheds making things that just work. We should get George from Robot Wars to come up with some crazy drone design that decapitates people and mass produce it to clear out the Donbas.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I worked at HK on the SA80 and was piece of work everytime, damn sheet metal garbage

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ah, the silicon valley startup approach.

      You end up with maybe 10% good projects, 70% grifters and 20% projects that seem great to the engineers but have limited practical use.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yeh but thats a fantastic return compared to 1% good projects , 50% of which never get finished and 49% of which never get started yet somehow 100% of them go 500% over budget.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          You know, I actually wonder if there’s a universal law at play here. Maybe the same budget and the same ability to project accountability always gets the same return. To fund every good idea in a short period you have to fund a certain amount of bad or nonexistent ones.

    • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s what they get for letting the EM-2 die in favor of conforming with NATO standardization of 7.62x51mm.

  • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Wait, I know I’m late to the party, but is that a bullpup sniper rifle?

    Why.

    I can’t see how a sniper rifle benefits from any of the positives of a bull-pup save for maybe the shorter profile being easier to store. Something a folding stalk would do just as well.

    Why?

    Not at all familiar with the gun. Please tell me it’s a regular rifle intented for a designated marksmen and not a real sniper rifle. I see the optic which pushes me in that direction

    • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean, the shorter profile with the full barrel gives you the mostest boolet speed in a compact package, best used for urban combat where there’s a lot of walls and cover interfering with a full-size rifle.

      There are bullpup snipers, tho - DesertTech makes a couple and Barrett has the model 99 (more an anti-materiel rifle).

    • eRac@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The SA80 is one of the early examples of the push to give everyone an optic.

      While the SA80 is a service rifle, there is a prominent bull pup sniper. In the early 80s, Walther made the WA2000. It was intended for urban counterterror operations, so it focused on portability and quick setup.

      • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        No, the SA80. I’m very familiar with the beautiful L96A1.

        Looks like I was wrong though and the SA80 is supposed to be a service rifle. Look man, I’m tired, allow me some stupidity

  • nuke@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Shout out to Sine_Fine_Belli who originally posted this over on R*ddit