• CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Idk, beehaw isn’t the most important thing and i get wanting to grow your stuff, but beehaw is like someone planting a forest of just one specific tree and they kill every other tree, its becoming a echo chamber like hexbear and Lemmygrad where they just keep radicalizing each other.

    • Z4rK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You can have narrow and niche interest communities and echo chambers without it being “radicalizing” each other. They can just all be very interested in this one type of tree, and that’s fine be me.

      • FeliXTV27@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, monocultures are bad, an environment always needs different plants to survive.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          But not all types of plants, as invasive species will wipe out diversity.

          Have to find a place where there is variety that is within a certain range of the rest so they bring each other up.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          True.

          Best example of this is in the urbanism space IMO, where we frequently speak highly of various cities and regions due to their amazing designs and infrastructure, but there’s not much mention that there’s more to a city than that - such as the job market, housing affordability, services, crime, etc…