Commented on a post with the most recent (non-Breitbart) headline and updates. Added this with 3 independent sources:

FYI, Breitbart is a far-right, low-quality source.

Media Bias Fact Check

Media Bias Chart

AllSides

Mod apparently didn’t like a more reputable source being added to their post because it was removed in minutes lol.

reason: Rule 6 Violation

Rule 6: Using the Poisoning The Well fallacy to attack sources shared in a post is presently not allowed (this rule may change in the future, and isolated instances will not subject you to a permanent ban)

Just admit you want an echo chamber to spread disinformation and promote biased articles! Using this rule to police sources is very thinly-veiled censorship…

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    PTB. Any community that allows Breitbart and its ilk should be avoided and removed. Absolutely nothing they publish is in good faith, factual, or otherwise. It’s right-wing rage porn, nothing more, nothing less.

    Edited to remain on-topic.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Agreed, but I was more diplomatic, simply pointing out the bias and the quality rating from multiple independent sources… Nope, immediately removed by the mod!

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Diplomacy with people who enable that cesspool of a publication is going to be a fail, always.

        They can be true believers, defensive idiots or trolls .

        I’m glad your experience was more or less civilized, even if rude