nuke@sh.itjust.worksM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 days agoYes. Pitter patter!sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1247arrow-down13
arrow-up1244arrow-down1imageYes. Pitter patter!sh.itjust.worksnuke@sh.itjust.worksM to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareRangerJosey@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29·4 days agoClearly it’s necessary to protect themselves from US aggression
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·4 days agoI assumed Canada already had nuclear weapons!
minus-squaregenevieve@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 days agoNuclear material, yes. Weapons, not yet. But by the election probably.
minus-squareEnceladus@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoCANDU reactors where in part cheaper than the alternative because it didn’t need to enrich uranium for the reactors. AFAIK, Canada does not have the facilities for enrichment.
Clearly it’s necessary to protect themselves from US aggression
I assumed Canada already had nuclear weapons!
Nuclear material, yes.
Weapons, not yet.
But by the election probably.
CANDU reactors where in part cheaper than the alternative because it didn’t need to enrich uranium for the reactors. AFAIK, Canada does not have the facilities for enrichment.