6. How does Waterfox make money?

Waterfox has search partnerships. That is, the default search on Waterfox is monetised. If you search with it, Waterfox gets a share of the revenue. You are under no obligation to use the default search - but if you like what Waterfox does and want to support the project, please consider using it.

Source: https://www.waterfox.net/docs/faq/

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Most free open source projects are hobbies, not jobs

    Do you think that is a good situation?

    As such, the goal of devs is often (and should be) to deliver a good product to people, no strings attached

    Why “should” it be the goal of the dev? Who are you to decide that for the developer?

    Expecting revenues with this project will slowly move you towards the non-free open source projects category

    That’s a prediction and I don’t know what data you’re basing that off of. Could you share it?

    I would imagine if a search engine is willing to sponsor a project in a way, then it must make enough money to justify that, and that often comes with bad privacy. I guess the default is Bing or something? The revenue comes at the expense of users on the default settings.

    Those are all assumptions. You do not know if the search engine is making enough money already. They might be trying to make money in the first place and getting it in front of users might be a way to raise awareness popularity. There are also companies like ecosia, duckduckgo, qwant, startpage and others that do care about privacy. Would you be against their sponsorship too?

    Anti Commercial-AI license

    • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Do you think that is a good situation?

      Yes, it should be the most important aspect of it. If the devs can live with it through donations and the project becomes their full time work, good, but that should never come at the expense of the user.

      Why “should” it be the goal of the dev? Who are you to decide that for the developer?

      That’s just my vision of it. Everyone is free to do whatever they want, but for me that’s a requirement for FOSS projects.

      That’s a prediction and I don’t know what data you’re basing that off of. Could you share it?

      Just a logical enshitification way. Profits always comes at a price. Keeping your project free while being for-profit often means getting forked and dying, much like ownCloud.

      Those are all assumptions. You do not know if the search engine is making enough money already. They might be trying to make money in the first place and getting it in front of users might be a way to raise awareness popularity. There are also companies like ecosia, duckduckgo, qwant, startpage and others that do care about privacy. Would you be against their sponsorship too?

      Whatever the end goal is, it’s still advertising and it’s impacting users’ freedom of choice by setting a default and virtually discouraging the use of other engines.

      This kind of info is often hidden (didn’t try Waterfox but I bet that it won’t say that the default search engine gives them money when you first start the browser), because they know it might make them look bad.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        I see now.

        Yes, it should be the most important aspect of it. If the devs can live with it through donations and the project becomes their full time work, good, but that should never come at the expense of the user.

        This is probably the source of our contention. This article (and this one too) explains where I come from. As a dev, I owe users fuck all. It’s my free time, not theirs. Imagine if whatever you were doing for free were suddenly claimed by others and they started making demands how you do it.

        But thank you for your answers. This is probably something we cannot agree on and something you have experience yourself. I encourage you to make something in your free time that other people use and that it becomes successful.

        Anti Commercial-AI license