The Beltway press’ longing for a stern-but-loving Republican daddy, who will bring our naughty nation in line, has always had an erotic tinge to it. In a widely shared Atlantic piece, drawn from his upcoming biography of Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, McKay Coppins allowed the subtext to edge alarmingly close to the text. “[O]ne can’t help but become a little suspicious of his handsomeness,” Coppins gushes. “The jowl-free jawline. The all-seasons tan. The just-so gray at the temples of that thick black coif.”

It seems Georgia politician Stacey Abrams isn’t the only one moonlighting as a steamy romance author. I rolled my eyes throughout Coppins’ piece, except for the parts where Romney dropped the daddy act to share bitchy gossip about his fellow senators. But, as far as mainstream pundits are concerned, Romney can totally get it. Coppins’ article was released simultaneously with Romney’s announcement that he’s retiring from the Senate, and the reception Romney got was fawning.

“Romney bows out, leaving a legacy that would make his father proud,” read the Washington Post headline of a Karen Tumulty column. She went so far as to credit Romney with “paving the way for national health-care reform,” ignoring the fact that Romney ran for president in 2012 on a promise to repeal Obamacare. Tumulty’s take was typical, as the press drowned Romney in words like “noble,” “principled,” and “courageous.” The hosannas on the “liberal” MSNBC grew to deafening levels.

All of this adulation is due mainly to the fact that Romney is the rare Republican holding elected office who is willing to state the obvious: That Donald Trump is a monster and a criminal who has no business in elected office.

But the problem with all of this Romney love is not that I personally feel sexually harassed by it. It’s that it fails to account for how Romney and other “traditional” Republicans are responsible for the rise of Trump and the MAGA movement. And not just because Romney and his ilk were only too happy to play along with Trump, even as he was pushing the racist “birther” conspiracy theory during the 2012 election cycle. It’s because they spent decades married to policy views that range from wildly unpopular to bat guano terrible, making it easy for a demagogue to come in with a platform of “who cares about policy, let’s just be super-racist.”

Romney obviously disagrees, praising himself for supposedly being the sober-minded policy guy:

But he won’t acknowledge that the rampant policy failures of Republicans are why the party has no path forward, except to become a fascist cult focused on settling imaginary scores. So let’s review some of the greatest hits of the pre-Trump era of traditional Republican “ideas.”

All this adulation is due mainly to the fact that Romney is the rare Republican holding elected office who is willing to state the obvious: That Donald Trump is a monster and a criminal who has no business in elected office.

Cutting taxes for the rich: This has been the number one Republican priority for decades, even though the first George Bush admitted it was “voodoo economics.” After decades of rising income inequality, no one believes the money will “trickle down” to everyone else. It has no real support outside of the wealthy people who benefit. Eight in 10 Americans disapprove of this policy. Even 43% of Republican voters don’t like it.

“Family values.” It’s not just that most Americans now support abortion rights and same-sex marriage. People are souring on the religious right and even abandoning religion altogether in record numbers.

Invading Iraq: I won’t belabor how terrible this was. I will just remind readers that it was the signature “achievement” of the last Republican president before Trump.

Health care: As far as I can tell, the GOP view of health care policy amounts to, “Have you considered just dying?” As with many issues, their own voters reject the party’s views, and will routinely vote to give themselves Medicaid even as party leaders try to stop them.

Climate change denialism. Not talked about much in the press, but there’s good reason to believe that decades of flat-out denying basic scientific facts did serious damage to the GOP in the eyes of younger voters. Trump may be a gold medal-level Olympian in the sport of lying, but he is building on a legacy of Republicans who would lie about the existence of gravity, if it pleases their corporate masters.

One could go on forever, but the bigger picture is this: On policy, Republicans simply have nothing to offer. They won’t improve people’s lives or fix existing problems. They only survived as long as they did because of gerrymandering and a tilted electoral map, backed by an unbelievable amount of money spent on right-wing propaganda like Fox News.

Trump understands the power of cynicism in politics all too well, and so was able to exploit this situation. He just sidestepped the policy issue altogether and instead offered something different: Naked hatred. Bigotry. Exciting conspiracy theories. And, crucially, a desire to destroy democracy altogether. After all, debating policy only matters if you’re trying to persuade people. If your goal is to crush them under your boot, there is no need to worry overmuch if they like your policies or not.

Again, Trump wouldn’t have gone this far without traditional Republicans like Romney laying the groundwork for decades. Republicans have long known that their policy views are unpopular and won’t win them elections, and so they’ve increasingly looked for ways to get power through cheating. Mainly, that was by passing laws that restricted voting access for people of color and young people, who tend to lean more Democratic. Romney is one of the guilty parties in this, even going so far as to compare President Joe Biden’s efforts to protect voting rights with Trump’s lies about the 2020 election.

Romney whined that voting rights advocates accuse their opponents of having “racist inclinations.” But what matters here is not what is in anyone’s heart. It’s totally possible, likely even, that many Republicans back voter suppression not because they hate Black people, but because they hate losing elections. But the effect of these laws and this rhetoric is the same: It implanted and reinforced the idea, with Republican voters, that there is something tawdry and illegitimate about Black people voting. Trump exploited that sensibility with his Big Lie, which rested on accusations that votes from racially diverse cities are necessarily “frauds.”

There were many opportunities over the years for Republicans to forge another path. They could have moderated their views on social issues. They could have gone the route of Richard Nixon, conceding that environmental concerns should trump a mindless anti-regulatory stance. They could have raised taxes on the rich with the pro-capitalist argument that it increases business investment. Considering that they still got nearly half of the votes with their unpopular policies, they really didn’t have to change much at all to be successful. Just be slightly less terrible on some issue, any issue.

But they didn’t do that and increasingly had nothing positive to offer to voters. That opened the door for an authoritarian demagogue, who built his power not on policy ideas, but on a promise he would hurt all the folks that conservative white people don’t like. Romney doesn’t deserve an ounce of credit. He may be unhappy with what his own failure of imagination helped usher in, but ultimately, this is still largely the fault of him and other “traditional” Republicans.

  • flossdaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Mitt Romney is awful, but he’s old-school awful, from back when awful had a floor it would not sink below.

    Now we have fully fascist Republican party that spits on the rule of law, on basic decency, and on our democracy.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Mitt still voted with his party 89% of the time during 2016-2020. He is no more or less moderate than any other repube. He is just good at wearing the veil like they used to in good ol’ days.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Based on how he did as governor of my home state of Massachusetts, I would say not all his idea are terrible and he’s probably not pure evil. So, really that makes him about the best possible GOP prospect at this point. For sane people anyway.

      • WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        The man is responsible for the company that murdered two beloved children’s toys retailers. That’s some classic kids show villainy.

      • keeb420@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        He’s one of those true believers in the old school republican party. Too bad even back then it meant siding with racists and grifters and bigots of all kinds. But I don’t believe romney is any of those, I think he’s a decent person overall who I completely disagree on public policy on for the most part. Now he has no place in the republican party.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Absolutely, Mitt Romney is bad, but he is not bat shit crazy and an idiot, like is becoming the norm among republicans today.

      • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        They at least tried to appear to have some sort of rock bottom. It was already pretty wobbly after Reagan and Bush but once the Obama birther bullshit hit mainstream the illusion faltered even more. Then Trump came along and obliterated it and here we are. We have the Republican Fascist Nazi Party of Misogynists and the Democrats Who Cut Off Their Noses To Spite Their Faces So They Don’t Really Support Or Push Progressive Canadiates Because the Corporate Teat Is So Yummy. So we are essentially stuck trying to keep the Democrats from fucking us in the ass too hard while we try and punch the Republicans in the face. Kinda like that scene from Fritz the Cat where Hitlers naked and chasing him trying to fuck him. Got it?

  • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    But this oligarch who did everything he could to fuck over poor Americans for his entire career and supported the vast majority of Trump’s awful polices spoke in Milquetoast Ivy League language about it all and tut-tutted Trump’s tone from time-to-time so he must be one of the good guys!

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    If active Republican politicians acted exactly like retired republican politicians (instead of just having a retirement-triggered rhetoric update right after they stop being able to actively influence anything), not only would I be able to tolerate that a lot better than what the party is today, but also our government would probably get a whole fucking lot more done.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      also our government would probably get a whole fucking lot more done.

      That’s not on their agenda. They don’t want the government getting anything done. That would restore faith in the institution, and they don’t want that. They’ve spent too much time and energy trying to tear it down.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well what I mean is that after retiring, they seem to suddenly give a whole lot more fucks about things they were actively trying to ruin in the decades leading up to their retirements.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Republicans have NOTHING to offer. For example, these 5 policy proposals I disagree with. In conclusion, ZERO policy proposals!”