“But over time, the executive branch grew exceedingly powerful. Two world wars emphasized the president’s commander in chief role and removed constraints on its power. By the second half of the 20th century, the republic was routinely fighting wars without its legislative branch, Congress, declaring war, as the Constitution required. With Congress often paralyzed by political conflict, presidents increasingly governed by edicts.”

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    We didn’t decide to abolish social structures though. Ever. And it is something the same as fire. We don’t abolish fire. We won’t ever stop having social structures.

    • Libra00@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m not saying abolish social structures altogether, I’m saying change them, and we change them all the time too.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Specifically, you are saying we should try not having empires. It’s an impossibility. Stop using freon and banning planet killer chemicals was not in the same dimension as fucking stop having civilization after we had it for 2 millenia

        • Libra00@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          You are conflating civilization with empire, the two words have different definitions for a reason. Imperialism is, according to Miriam-Webster, ‘the policy, practice, or advocacy of extending the power and dominion of a nation especially by direct territorial acquisitions or by gaining indirect control over the political or economic life of other areas’. New Zealand qualifies as civilization in most peoples’ books, it’s not an empire, and there are lots of other similar examples out there.