• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thanks, for any of this argument to hold any water it has to be demonstrated that trans athletes have any sort of advantage.

    This is reminding me of something I just watched, the 30 for 30 about Oscar Pistorius. One of the paraathletes they interviewed commented on how welcoming and excited everyone was when Oscar started competing outside of the paraathletic events. It was only once he demonstrated that he could beat “able bodied” athletes that people started getting pissy. This guy also pointed out the disadvantages that running prosthetics introduce, but people only focus on the fact that the running prosthetics conserve momentum better than human ankles do.

    At the end of the day, most every sport isn’t fair. You need time, money, luck, the right coaches, mentors, I could go on and on.

    • mystique@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      So true. Trans athletes are allowed to succeed, so it should not change anything even if they are, but broadly speaking, this is not what’s happening. The state of Georgia just banned trans women from women’s sports through high school, there are currently 0 known athletes who precipitated this ban. The Scottish FA just banned trans women from women’s leagues, this affects 1 woman playing recreationally. The women’s pro rugby union in the United States, WER, has (I’m pretty sure) only 1 trans woman athlete, her team is currently in last place and has yet to win a game.

      Trans women are women, trans men are men. They come in all shapes and sizes and varieties and they deserve inclusion no matter their unique form.