Not one major news outlet is covering the destruction of Starlink this summer. Though Lemmy might enjoy Elon losing more money.

  • neocamel@lemmy.studio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article seems to indicate that the loss of 200 satellites is largely attributed to solar flares, not orbit degradation.

    • ripcord@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the point of the article is that this is higher than expected.

      It is also potentially interesting for people that weren’t aware of how often these satellites will deorbit and so the potential costs associated. Even people aware that this happens may not have thought about it much with Starlink or be aware of the scope.

      OP is being a little stupid with the editorializing, and the article could be better, but the article is generally good and useful.