I’ve got a bit lost with it cos a) it’s unfathomable b) there’s a lot of info

  • LadyButterfly@lazysoci.alOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s being slanted that way in the media to get clicks, but the evidence is massive but dry, boring and hard to follow. It’s like:

    Lucy’s swipe card shows she was in at A time, she was updated computer records at BC and D times, and using her phone at EF and G times. Person H saw her doing I at J time, person K saw her etc etc. It all pinpoints her movements.

    There’s also many things like Lucy says she could see Child I was pale from 5 or 6 feet away in a darkened room in the below cot, which isn’t credible:

    And in cross examination about it she said she could see it because “I knew what I was looking for… I mean at”.