• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Oh look. Another violation of our Constitution.

    Hope everyone is well aware that our Constitution is basically toilet paper now.

    The collapse of our democracy is imminent.

    • j_elgato@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Imminent?

      Hmm… I think it has already happened and we are just in there awkward lull as we await the consequences to start rolling in…

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      i wish, batteries are still too heavy to replace jet fuel, hydrogen could work weight wise, but too low density and you just don’t have space in an airplane (you could design one but it’ll be too big and have too much drag).

      best possibility for now is biofuels. basically plug and play.

      better yet, replace all major overland routes with high speed rail, much cheaper than flying anyways.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          We’ve had batteries with better energy density than fossil fuels for centuries?

          Were the Roman’s just sitting on magic batteries but did nothing with them because no one had invented the iPhone yet?

          • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Nope. Sails. They work great for moving people and cargo across oceans.

            No fossil fuels required

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Taxpayers spending billions to accept a bribe that’s a fraction of the cost.

      America cant even do bribing right.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is EXACTLY why we ELIMINATED my Child’s EDUCATION! So we can Afford THIS!

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And since the plane gets transferred to Trump’s actual ownership after his term, Trump gets a free $2billion plane…

    • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      lol that’s not how value works. If you add $1 million worth of mods to your civic and then remove them for a similar cost, you still have an old civic

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 day ago

      The military is already ordered to strip it again when they are don’t with it, meaning he gets all the work done for free.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well considering the current contract for the two 747s Boeing is currently converting for the government is a fixed cost contract that’s already paid for technically infinite I guess?

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Air Force awarded Boeing a $3.9 billion contract in 2018 for two new Air Force One planes, updated VC-25B models based on the newer 747-8I. Delivery originally was slated for 2024 but currently they are looking at 2027.

      • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess not quite 1, but at least it isn’t decades old. Though, who knows, government projects like this have a habit of ballooning in cost.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          That was a fixed price contract for the new planes. Boeing will have to eat any cost overruns. Their CEO has Already been complaining about it.

          The days of cost plus contracting with companies like Boeing are essentially gone luckily. Now that the practice is decently well known by the public, it can’t just be hidden as a cost of private sector business anymore like they used to claim.

          A decently large reason for that is SpaceX’s dramatically cheaper space launch costs, even with iterative design principles resulting in a lot of “waste” designs and products being destroyed or never used. Their contracts were fixed prices through NASA commercial programs so they never received contracts cost plus the way companies like Boeing did, so they actually optimized to minimize their costs. They proved in the real world that cost plus wasn’t necessary for those contracts at all, and Boeing has been one of the worst hit by that.

          • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I meant the updating of the Qatari plane could balloon to equal the cost of one of the newer planes.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh possibly. Not sure the government has even signed those contracts yet at this point.

              The one surprising thing is that the Qatari jet is actually a 747-8 model like the two new contracted planes. So I suppose it could technically be outfitted as a new Air Force One, then only one of the new airframes finished and outfitted, and then gut this to finish the second new airframe, leaving a gutted 747-8 for Trump.

              But we know that’s not what will happen.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      trump the ever moron, thought he was getting a steal, when in fact that 400million jet had a very expensive upkeep. it was mostly like costing QATARIS to even having sit in an airplane hanger in thier country before “gifting” it to trump.

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Hey, if you can figure out a cheaper way for the president to accept bribes they’ll be happy to ignore it

  • leckiesock@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Will the us airforce be spending 1.5 billion on trump?

    No, the U.S. Air Force is not spending $1.5 billion on a plane for Trump. The claim likely stems from a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of two separate issues involving Trump and Air Force One.

    Why do you spread lies?