GNU Taler begins operating in Switzerland, distributed by the Taler Operations AG. Gnu Taler aims to be a “digital wallet” and has been used by the swiss national bank as well as the european national bank as a example for how a digital currency handed out by the state could work. It aims to be as privacy preserving as cash for the buyer while not allowing the seller to evade taxes.

Currently the Taler is brought out by a special organisation, the “Taler Operations AG”, and not the national bank, although both the national bank as well as the Taler Team have shown interest in a official digial currency by the national bank based on the Taler. But we need to relativate as the national council has stated that the introduction of a digital currency would probably take relatively major legislative changes and therefore take a bit of time.

  • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s something I’m really struggling to understand when talking about things like Taler, and the “Digital euro” idea which has come up recently as well: What is it actually doing that’s new?

    Money is distributed digitally already. When you get a paycheck, no-one is actually moving physical paper and metal cash from a business account bank vault to a customer account bank vault, it’s just numbers in a spreadsheet. So what’s actually new when we’re talking about digital currency like this post?

    There must be something I’m missing here.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Taler provides digital cash as in anonymous transactions for the buyer. Neither the bank nor the state knows who you pay or for what.

      However, the merchant can’t hide that they are making money, thus enabling taxation and prevention of money laundering. That way it’s even better than cash.

      It’s not based on blockchains and proof of work and thus doesn’t have the ridiculous energy waste problems.

      It’s really quite good.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A lot of good replies here, but one thing that Taler doesn’t do and credit cards do is…credit. This can be solved by having a line of credit at your bank and using Taler over that, which may actually be cheaper, as well.

      As a non-European, I hope this spreads.

    • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Current Platforms are private businesses. Paypal, Mastercard, Visa, they’re all private businesses that can do whatever they want. This means that 1 They all charge a lot of money (I think 1-5% of the purchase) 2.1 since they’re all american the new Führer can turn off digital payments for a Business or even an entire Country he doesn’t like. And the way he uses every single leverage he can get to get others agree to his terms, this seems realistic. 2.2 since they’re private businesses with a quasi-monopoly on digital payments, they can threaten our economies if we try to do something they don’t like, say raising taxes on them or limiting how much they can charge. A Taler by the national bank would be completely sovereign and make us independent from the US and its companies.

      The Taler also has the advantage that the buyer is anonymous. So if you want to buy a Dildo without the seller, the bank, the government or even your family knowing, you can. If you delete the payment from your history then there is no proof at all that that payment came from you (well, your shipping address is on the package, but that’s not something the Taler can solve lol). However, different from other crypto currencies, the seller is NOT anonymous, which prevents tax evasion.

      Hope that cleared it up?

      • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yes, this helps, thanks.

        I already understood the need to avoid private money agents like Paypal, visa, etc. In the UK we have the BACS and FPS systems that allow for direct free money transfer. Though they should be more usable for day to day transactions, they work well enough if you need to send a significant amount of money between bank accounts.

        Your explanation of the anonymity seems like the real value add of these digital currencies. The fact this only applies to the buyer and not the seller is a good choice, and definitely wins over blockchain crypto. Looking at it more closely, the fact they use signed tokens rather than proof-of-x is also a very good choice.

        I will need to read up on Taler’s docs more closely. But looking at the summary of features on their site something hits me as an immediate problem - you need to “load up” a wallet. If Jane Doe wants to buy a coffee, it’s far easier to just use a bank card (which may interface through a private money agent like visa, or a middleman like google/apple). Loading up private wallets isn’t a difficult concept (it’s how gift cards work), but it does add extra steps of friction that I think will need to be removed before this can really be taken up by the general public.

        It may harm the anonymity aspect, but I think that to get people using it a system that could operate like a tap-once-and-done bank card payment, loading up a wallet for immediate spend seems like the best solution. It would also help alleviate any fears that typically are associated with blockchain based digital currency - primarily of losing the signed digital money as it sits in a wallet out with the bank account’s protections. And once the system is normalised and people are used to it, then all the architecture is there for anyone that really needs the anonymity.

      • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        24 hours ago

        an additional note: part of why is it not perfect is that you can’t send money privately to another person, like you would do with cash. in transactions like that there is a 3rd party involved that overses the transaction

        • piyuv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Solving tax evasion while keeping both parties anonymous would be incredibly hard if not outright impossible though. Cash is king for privacy but also for tax evasion.

          I don’t think any digital solution could or should replace cash. They can and should exist and function together.

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I dont see how would it be a flaw of visa, but according to the Taler FAQ this is a feature.

            Can I send money to my friends with Taler?

            Taler supports push and pull payments between wallets (also known as peer-to-peer payments). While the payment appears to be directly between wallets, technically the operation is intermediated by the payment service provider which will typically be legally required to identify the recipient of the funds before allowing the transaction to complete.

            • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              It would be a flaw of visa as you need a card reader or similar to recieve payments, your friend can’t just send you a fiver easily.

              • Untrending@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                That’s solved now that PayPal (and others?) start including this functionality into their mobile apps. No card reader required anymore

                • irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  51 minutes ago

                  There’s still the problem of those being private companies, and often being the morality police when it comes to buying stuff online.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            That’s definitely something that gets listed as an advantage of The Digital Euro, and something that you can’t do with Visa (although you can with PayPal), so if expect that Taler supports it.

    • tychosmoose@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Two of the things that I think are new vs the current system are:

      Wallet: anonymous holding of currency without a custodian. You can’t hold fiat currency digitally today without a bank or other entity providing that service.

      Transfer: moving fiat currency anonymously and under your own direction without intermediaries. You can’t make a digital payment or transfer in pure fiat currency today without that custodian providing the service (often through fee-based payment network). As a result, your identity is known when that transaction happens.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        This.

        A legit offline digital currency transfer akin to how one uses cash.

        And ofc a giant body regulating it with proper audits, directives, delegated acts, etc.

        Additionally this opens up the possibility of a modern personal existence without banks (ie private companies). We are now basically forced to use banks + (USA) monies transfer systems.

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Disclaimer: Not an expert on this.

      It was previously not really possible to send money digitally directly, except in the form of cyptocurrency. It always goes through banks or intermediaries. If you transfer money between bank accounts, the banks have to talk to each other to do so, and the “real” transfer happens between their central bank accounts at a later point in time. There is indeed only spreadsheets with numbers going up and down. Effectively the banks are in control of all of it. In most cases we don’t want a slow bank transfer but some sort of user-friendly payment portal like PayPal or wero, which the banks also need to have contracts with (or, operate themselves).

      My vague understanding here is that this process is completely detached from banks, and that you are thus transferring actual money. It’s not just numbers in a spreadsheet going up and down.

      If anybody understands it better please correct anything I got wrong.