• WarmSoda@lemm.eeEnglish
      191·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s more of a “thank God” moment than anything. The way shits been going these past few years it’s completely possible thier traffic could have gone up. Just because.

    • varsock@programming.devOPEnglish
      18·
      1 year ago

      to be fair, the original poster used the word “tanking” and he knows a thing or two about DNS. I thought “tanking” was too click-baity and toned it down :D

      • abhibeckert@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        Tanking is accurate - they were the 32nd highest traffic domain and now they’re 42nd (fell even further since that screenshot was taken).

        Ten places, when you’re that close to the highest traffic domains on the internet, is massive. Twitter has gone from similar traffic to Bing to having less traffic than Spotify.

        Worse though - more than half of their losses over six months happened in the last week or two.

        • varsock@programming.devOPEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          what surprised me here is how much traffic bing gets 😅 integrating with AI was a real pro move, it seems.

          Any insight into how much the reduction in traffic is just restricting API usage and actual user interaction? Surely there is a correlation in more API usage (if not just scraping) would drive more engagement?

    • Jee@lemmy.fmhy.mlEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      The dip is small but the enormous debt Elon put on its back will definitely kill it soon enough.

        • bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          Nah, at this point his only option is to cancel Starship and redirect all of its development funding into building a time machine so that he can dramatically increase the amount of weed he was smoking at the time he got the brilliant idea to buy Twitter so that his brain is made incapable of actually following through with it.

  • thicket@programming.devEnglish
    371·
    1 year ago

    While I would love to see Twitter auguring straight into the ground, Twitter’s API changes would explain some portion of this traffic changes. I wonder if there are any other proxy measures for audience engagement as separate from basic traffic

    • robolemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      162·
      1 year ago

      Between the egregious API pricing and the recent login requirement, this traffic graph makes perfect sense.

      I agree that we need some measure of actual engaged human beings before we start dancing on twitter’s grave.

  • 🇺🇦 Max UL@lemmy.proEnglish
    81·
    1 year ago

    Does Twitter use Cloudflare? I hate anything Elon and want him to fail, but it would be kinda crazy for the CEO of a company I use services with to broadcast an embarrassing indicator to the world that my business isn’t going well.

    • varsock@programming.devOPEnglish
      16·
      1 year ago

      I dont know to what capacity twitter uses cloudflare but cloudflare is rather ubiquitous. Even if twitter didn’t have services with cloudflare, when a user’s device resolves the domain name “twitter.com” to an IP address, it might go through Cloudflare’s DNS servers. And givien the ubiquity of Cloudflare DNS, this is likely frequently. By monitoring the DNS queries for Twitter.com, Cloudflare can estimate the traffic volume by analyzing the number and frequency of requests received.

      I don’t know why cloudflare’s CEO would do that or where he keeps his huge steel balls, but today I learned I can mine Cloudflare’s internet usage data. And I might have found a new hobby!

      Cloudflare Radar has an API that gives access to Cloudflare’s data on global Internet traffic..

      Radar’s API is free, allowing academics, data sleuths and other web enthusiasts to investigate Internet usage across the globe.

    • KingKRool@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      1 year ago

      I suspect DNS rankings from Cloudflare DNS lookups (1.1.1.1) makes more sense as the source of the data. However Twitter/Musk are refusing to pay rent and were even refusing to pay vendors like Google Cloud in an attempt to save cash and renegotiate prices. So I wouldn’t be that shocked if Cloudflare terminated them for non-payment and publicly shamed them. Even then I think it’s unlikely they’d do it like this as Cloudflare probably wouldn’t want to concern their other customers.

    • neil@programming.devEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      They use Atlanta Metro, AWS and GCP as far as I know. I want to say they own the Oregon DC but can’t remember.

    • MostlyBirds@lemmy.worldEnglish
      21·
      1 year ago

      Ok but you’d actually be paying what you owe for the services you receive, presumably.

      • varsock@programming.devOPEnglish
        8·
        1 year ago

        see comment above, but in short twitter need not hire cloudflare for services. Cloudflare plays an important role in the backbone of the internet. If twitter is resolved through cloudflare’s DNS, cloudflare can estimate the volume of traffic to Twitter.com. This appears what had happened given the published graph is “DNS ranking”. FYI, and for mine as well as I just discovered, we can generate that graph by our selves by using cloudflare’s Radar API

    • laxe@lemmy.mlEnglish
      16·
      1 year ago

      It measures the most popular sites by dns lookup. Twitter fell from 32nd to 39th.

        • laxe@lemmy.mlEnglish
          8·
          1 year ago

          App users still make API calls to Twitter’s domain. Depending on the domain name, these app users might still be counted.

        • cabbage@programming.devEnglish
          8·
          1 year ago

          not a definite measurement for a decline in users but I would argue it shows a trend of less users visiting the site

    • Nesuniken@lemmy.oneEnglish
      13·
      1 year ago

      Did you even try to find them? I’m on my phone and I still had no trouble locating them.