• aidan@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, I’m not trying to say its black and white, I’m just saying its not as devoid of nuance as I feel like they’re presenting it.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think the irreducible complexity debate is over. Creationist scientists will continue to publish “but maybe” arguments because defending creationism is part of their identity, but its just a “but maybe this gap in human knowledge proves XYZ”. They are starting with a conclusion and looking for arguments that it isn’t impossible.

      • aidan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree, I don’t think that a lack of current understanding proves the existence of god in any way. But them drawing the wrong conclusion doesn’t mean that they aren’t right about there being a lack of current understanding.