Maybe they’re trying to do LLM-generated articles and are screwing up?
Problem is, some of the text doesn’t seem like something that an AI would come up with. I mean, I can get minor errors, but describing an entire nonexistent init system without some kind of directive in that direction?
but describing an entire nonexistent init system without some kind of directive in that direction?
Someone else, i.e. the user called “notabot”, had already made the following interesting observations:
rye is software that actually exists and is found within the repos
rye is written in rust
rye has an init command; rye init
I don’t think it’s too far-fetched to think that an LLM is aware of the above. But, it failed to understand what rye actually is and how its init command isn’t competing with systemd.
Hmm.
Maybe they’re trying to do LLM-generated articles and are screwing up?
Problem is, some of the text doesn’t seem like something that an AI would come up with. I mean, I can get minor errors, but describing an entire nonexistent init system without some kind of directive in that direction?
Someone else, i.e. the user called “notabot”, had already made the following interesting observations:
rye
is software that actually exists and is found within the reposrye
is written in rustrye
has an init command;rye init
I don’t think it’s too far-fetched to think that an LLM is aware of the above. But, it failed to understand what
rye
actually is and how its init command isn’t competing with systemd.