• imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    The whole WMD situation is so shit. Iran cant have a stalemate to prevent attacks on them if they dont have nuclear weapons, so they would be attacked all the time to prevent them from having one. Yet their regime is also the one which is not a friendly to neighbors and has barely any friendly allies therefore it is in the best interests of the rest of the world that they won’t get nuclear weapons. And again, preventing them from having it would allow Israel to bomb them freely.

    Dunno how others see it, but no matter what side I try to look at this issue at, this is all looks bad and worse than the previous angle. Sad to acknowledge that Iranians have to go through this. Even if regime fails, I bet it’ll take many decades for Iranians to become a free of regime state.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yet their regime is also the one which is not a friendly to neighbors and has barely any friendly allies therefore it is in the best interests of the rest of the world that they won’t get nuclear weapons.

      I’m pretty sure the zio regime is least friendly to the people who are actually from the middle east. The zio regime is literally bombing Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, etc. They have an overt plan to steal land from bascially every country. They’re engaged in an active genocide.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Israel

      It’s definitely in the interest of humanity to disarm these nuclear terrorists.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

      I bet it’ll take many decades for Iranians to become a free of regime state.

      How long until the middle east is free from the zio terror regime?

      Gotta be delusional AF to think Iran is the problem here.