• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 年前

    I’m sure glad we developed technology just to avoid paying one person to drive that truck. This is progress and will not have knock on consequences. We should celebrate this.

    • hakase@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      This, but unironically. Automation is a good thing, and every driver who loses their job over this drives the necessity of finding post-automation solutions that much closer to the breaking point.

      • echo64@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        Oh yes, I’m sure our current socioeconomic systems will get right on finding post automation solutions. That’ll happen real soon now. I mean, it’ll have to happen, right? We won’t just let all the jobs dissolve away so that shareholders get richer, right? That would be crazy to do that. I can’t imagine a society that would possibly do that, could you?

      • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        Yes because losing your job to robots is fun, rich will be richer and poor will be more miserable