Title left as is, it’s just so silly.

It was sex toys.

“The issue isn’t that they are displaying [adult toys], it’s the fact they’re displaying them at the baby aisle where so many children will be exposed to it. It’s a family supermarket - they should be more cautious with where they place things. The manager meant no offence, but he said my child won’t exactly know what it is.”

“But it’s not about if the child recognises what the item is, it should not be displayed to begin with. It doesn’t matter if the child understands or not. It made me a bit angry because an older child, who is also innocent, might understand what it is.”

  • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is what she’s angry about

    Get a fucking grip, Ayesha. This is like being offended by Tesco selling tampons or toothbrushes or something.

    an older child, who is also innocent, might understand what it is

    By definition, if someone knows what these things are, they aren’t “innocent”. It’s not like they scream sex toy. They even look like they could be vapes or something.