• uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Iphone is most locked-down anti-consumer pile of garbage and this is how you defend it?

        • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are different aspect to the same product. IPhone is lockeddown and aniconsumer, but it doesn’t mean every aspect of it is not worth taking a lesson from.

          In order for linux to have mass apeal, it will need to be simple by default, and that is where the app store model shines, you just search and click install, everyone can figure that out.

          But that doesn’t imply linux has to be lockdown and anticonsumer like iphone. If you want to compile your own kernel, you should have freedom to do so.

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            and that is where the app store model shines, you just search and click install, everyone can figure that out.

            This is how linux works for last 30 years…

            • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Except now you dont need to worry about outdated software even on a super stable base. You get proper permission control and a mispackaged app cannot break the entire system.

              • uis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You get proper permission control and a mispackaged app cannot break the entire system.

                How did this come up in discussion?

                Anyway. Mispackaged app may also include broken permission control.

                • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How did this come up in discussion?

                  Because permission control is what most people expect on phone application, which is another way linux has great default UX that is similar to what happens on phones.

                  Finally, I don’t think a mispackaged app is supposed to be able to break out of the application sandbox, unless some bug is exploited.

                  Unless you are referring to the fact that some app are packaged with overly-permissive default permissions. But most people can change the default permission, and only grant permissions that makes sense.

                  • uis@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Finally, I don’t think a mispackaged app is supposed to be able to break out of the application sandbox, unless some bug is exploited.

                    At least one of mentioned formats(AppImage) is regular executable. There is no need to break out of sandboxing when maintainer didn’t put it in sandbox in the first place.

                    Anyway, mainline distros have selinux or apparmor profiles. Sanboxing exists outside of three yet another “universal” package formats.

                    But most people can change the default permission, and only grant permissions that makes sense.

                    You mean people who package or end users?