• TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      they actually have to reference the function by string name.

      This is true of a lot of the opt-in language features though, isn’t it? For example, you can just make an .Add method on any IEnumerable type and get collection initializer syntax supported for it, even as an extension method. The same works for Dispose on ref structs I believe, and I remember there being a few other places where this was true (GetAwaiter I think?).

    • Lucky@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is for custom collections, right? And you don’t even have to use it, you can keep using existing ctors for your custom collections

      Worse case scenario you keep doing what we’ve always had to do. But for the 99% of use cases we get a much more streamlined initializer, with extensions to use our own.

      I don’t see how that’s a bad thing