Brand new, out of the box. It’s been sitting here at 100% for 5 minutes.

  • shadowfly@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arch: 30sec for update, 2min for full system upgrade

    Kubuntu: 2min for update, 10min for full system upgrade

    Windows: 5min for update, 30min for full system upgrade

    Ubuntu: Please close firefox so i can install update. You closed it? Well… the update can wait.

    Gentoo: 💀

  • the_seven_sins@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can somebody explain why Windows is so much slower than… basically every other OS? I mean, what does Windows-Update differently then a apt-get upgrade?

    • idoubledo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      AFAIK the main reason is in how windows handles the filesystem - in linux everything is a file and all files are cached by default unless that memory is needed by default, so 100% memory utilization is the norm and where Linux operates most efficiently. In windows file caching seems architecturally be an after-thought and much less efficient - i.e. this causes handling a lot of files (like when updating the OS, where a lot of files need to be modified) to break the caching system and cause a lot of cache thrashing.