Remember, the social Democrats sided with the Nazis over the socialists. They’ve done it every time they’ve been given the opportunity, and will continue to do so as many times as people fall for their shtick.

“The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house."
-Audre Lorde

  • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All I’m getting out of this is that the German communists didn’t oppose the Nazis because of grudges and spite, instead of swallowing their pride to prevent actual fascists from seizing power. Typical accelerationist ends-justify-the-means bullshit. No wonder the United States had to bankroll the Soviet war effort, communists can’t accomplish a damn thing without purity testing everyone who could help, doing their best to cut off the nose because it will at least spite the face.

    • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tfOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Have you not heard, first they came for the communists? They were literally the first people taken out, specifically because they violently opposed both the traitorous social democrats who sent thousands of working class men to die in a rich man’s war, and the later developed Nazi party. It was social democrats, which are by definition capitalist and not communists, who murdered their Allies and sided with the nationalists.

        • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tfOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the difference is, you’re saying the communists were infighting. The communists were United, they had their internal conflicts, (direct action vs parliamentarianism) but they were together. It was the CAPITALIST Social Democratic Party that murdered them. CAPITALISTS murdered them. Not other communists. Bernie Sanders isn’t a communist. AOC isn’t a communist. Neither was the SPD.

          • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In other words, yes, you are. I almost wish you could see how funny this is from the outside. You just don’t get it at all, do you?

            • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Gustav Noske, the “Bloodhound of the SPD”, used Freikorps (proto-fascist and/or monarchist) militias to kidnap and murder communists, who at the time were more influential than the SPD in many parts of the country.

        • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tfOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s because they were more dangerous. There’s a reason the Nazis kept the socialism in their party name. Communism and socialism were immensely popular in Germany. Without that corruption, or with a more informed working class, it’s unlikely the Nazis would have been govern the opportunity they needed to consolidate power under their rule.

          I’ve heard your theory, too, for sure. I’ve just never seen a book to back it up. Do you have one? I’m always looking for more books about German pre-WWII history, it’s one of my favorite topics.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Communists were easier because they were further out to the left. Easier to destroy the extreme first