- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
In the past, when there was a much higher tax on high income earners, instead of paying more in taxes, they would spread the wealth a little more equitably. This was true in Hollywood, in corporations, hell, in working service industry jobs. There were still rich, but so were others. In the past 40 years, we have been experiencing the greatest wealth transfer (over $50 fucking trillion ) from the working class to the 1% ever. And it’s poised to get worse. Anyone who doesn’t support unions and a strongly progressive tax is either ignorant of the history of the US, or an asshole. There is no in between.
what about a movement to illegalize lobbying and remove corruption?
Lobbying is an important and necessary government function. The Americans with Disabilities Act is the greatest success of social lobbying in history.
Unlimited dark money corporate lobbying used to be illegal and needs to be illegal again. And we need to get the regulatory capture pipeline under control somehow. Being able to leave government agencies for lucrative positions at corporations you were supposed to be regulating is the biggest problem after unlimited dark money for campaigns.
Every year, there are actors who had roles in Return of the Jedi, who get letters informing that although their contact entitles them to money that film’s net profit, sadly Return of the Jedi hasn’t made any profit yet!
Huh. The circus is going on strike.
If the bread (food service workers) goes on strike too, maybe we’ll see some real change.
The real strike now needs to be sfx and postprod. At the moment studios are banking on what’s in the pipeline
Half the food service workers are paid in tips. Which is a giant and very effective bandaid to the issue.
The reality is, the income is pretty good for most tipped food service work. Better than in most comparable jobs. The bosses taking themselves out of the equation makes the effective wages pretty decent, even if it feels pretty ugly for everyone else. There’s a huge anti-tip movement growing… maybe that’s the 4D chess. Get rid of all the tips to ensure food service workers get paid absolute crap just like everyone else so that they show a bit more solidarity with other jobs. But really, it’s probably just people who want to pay less and haven’t 100% thought through the counterfactual of how the world without tips will look for the workers, absent fixing the fundamental issues of wage society as they currently exist first. Tips work out in practice to revenue sharing. Until wage laws include some amount of mandatory revenue sharing to workers (which they absolutely should for so many reasons), getting rid of tips will hurt the workers.
I’d like to see some regional cookery unions, though. Even in places where the line cook wages aren’t that terrible, those are still the worst-treated people in a restaurant. They’re treated as totally disposable and interchangeable. They need a union that represents not just the members of any particular store, but disparate stores in a geographic area.
Not everywhere, that’s for sure.
The waitresses said they make the federal minimum wage for tipped workers, which is $2.13 per hour. The intention is that the bulk of their income will primarily come from tips. Schoolmeester-Cochran estimated she works anywhere from 21 to 35 hours each week and, with tips, brings in a salary ranging from $70 some weeks to $170 others. <-- Waffle House employee
But the rare places they don’t are also places where the alternative is fed min wage – also unlivable poverty – , under table submin wage, or no job at all / mlm psychosis.
I get it’s unpopular to speak in support of tips. People hate tipping so much. But until we seriously talk about what will replace it, all the demands to ban it are just part of false consciousness. We need to be more honest that most of the antitip culture is not coming from people who want the working class supported. It comes from people who think these workers are being paid too much.
I’m not surprised. There was a tweet from Ed Soloman, one of the writers on Men In Black, some time ago now, showing his yearly statement of residuals on that film.
Despite making almost $600m on a $90m budget and spawning a franchise, he was informed by the statement that the film was a loss for Sony and the studio is still in the red.
I love this, John, but for pete’s sake please go find a writer on the picket lines to write these, this is such a mess to read.
What’s up with the writing - seems kinda weird, are the tweets real? I don’t have twitter so i (semmingly?) can’t check myself.
I like John Cusack, he’s a great actor and seems like a decent human being, so no big deal either way but just wondering what’s up with that.
I’ve been on his IG page. I think that’s just how he sounds.
I mean, John Cusack has always been kind of a weirdo
The whole family has always seemed a little weird, they’re great actors though.
Loved Joan, and the cast as a whole, in Toys! Very weird!
Huh, he must’ve really believed that kickboxing was the sport of the future
What do you mean? What’s wrong with the writing?
Yeah it’s not the worst. Could use some editing, and it’s a little run-on, but otherwise alright.
Here’s the first tweet https://twitter.com/johncusack/status/1679695541012254722 referenced from https://news.yahoo.com/john-cusack-rails-against-legendary-101005394.html
agreed, this almost read like a trump post
At one point he mentions a well known actress making 1/7th the salary of her male co-star, and that she was making just under 4K a week.
So there’s clearly money to go around if the dudes can get 28k a week, and the “shows or movies are losing millions” argument the accountants and tax dealers use makes no sense
really, none of this is new. we’ve known all of this for a long, long time, haven’t we?
I mean, John Cusack has always been kind of a weirdo
