We need to permanently bolt a shock collar onto the neck of the Burger King CEO. Whenever he proposes something monstrously inhuman and abominable, an AI will detect it and give him an incredibly painful shock.
So you are against someone using ai to make sure people say ‘welcome’ and ‘thank you’ in a customer facing role, but you are totally for using ai to torture people you don’t like.
Think about that and maybe do some self-reflection.
I think I found someone else in need of an AI shock collar…
So you are against AI in customer service, but you are for AI shock collars that torture people who disagree with you? Think about that and maybe do some self-reflection.
Yup. That’s exactly what I’m saying and believe. Good job. Now here’s your shock collar, it’s programmed to activate whenever the wearer has shitty bad-faith takes on a subject.
How is what I said a bad-faith take? I responded to your comments.
You literally said: "We need to permanently bolt a shock collar onto the neck of the Burger King CEO. Whenever he proposes something monstrously inhuman and abominable, an AI will detect it and give him an incredibly painful shock." and after I brought it up, you doubled down and said, “I think I found someone else in need of an AI shock collar…”
How is anything I said, bad-faith? Did you or did you not say those things?
Or maybe you thought it’s ok to ‘joke’ about shock-collars and torture. Maybe you can explain, so I can understand.
I also support public flogging of those incapable of understanding satire.
Ohhh, so it was satire. Ok ok… Hmmmm…
So ya think it’s ok to ‘joke’ about shock-collars and torture, because hey, it’s just satire. Even tho that’s for real used to torture people in today’s world. Good to know that it’s all definitely fodder for just a joke. Right? Joking about torture doesn’t seem awesome to me.
But hey, if it’s satire, man…
