You must log in or # to comment.
I could be trippin but whenever I see ads with AI generated ‘hot women’ the dead giveaway to me is always the neck. It always look off for some reason, like too narrow or too long or something. I wonder how many times this likely Nazi-ish MAGA creator had to fight with the AI to force pale skin and blond hair.
This plus those horribly cheesy propaganda war videos that are like a Simpsons parody of themselves, man… I really expected better propaganda from the Trump regime but they suck at it.
It’s always weird to me how AI generated people look pretty much flawless yet also have some uncanny feature.
Real people don’t look “flawless“
I don’t think I would have guessed this one was generative imaging, certainly not from one or two pictures. I would have guessed something was up with it, though, from the prurient interest. The barefoot poses, the tongue-out poses, the so-short skirt, the pictures specifically framed to include the high heels, the form fitting crop top with the perfect “emphasize my bosom” pose. Individually plausible, I guess, but together the effect is less military and more OnlyFans.
Edit: I guess I’m not finishing my point, here. A more subtle operator would be able to fool me with this level of image generation, in fact, I don’t have any good reason to imagine that hasn’t happened already.
I think what makes it difficult is we’ve had years and years already of people using filters too so ‘flawless’ doesn’t raise doubt like it would have in the past. Its def very very very good a simulation, will give them credit. But ya there’s this sunshiness and just slight defying of anatomical physics that seems to be a trend with AI generated women.
Blond hair, blue eyes and hardly any traces of tanning on that pale skin. Interesting coincidence of a choice for an army mascot.
