Psychedelic Mind Control

Carhart-Harris et al., 2012 (PNAS). Psilocybin doesn’t increase brain activity. It decreases it. Specifically, it suppresses the default mode network (DMN), the brain’s self-referential processing system, the thing that maintains the boundary between “me” and “not-me.”

In River terms: the DMN is the riverbank. Psychedelics dissolve it.

Muthukumaraswamy et al., 2013 (Human Brain Mapping). LSD and psilocybin cause broadband suppression of oscillatory power, particularly in the alpha band (8–12 Hz). Alpha is the brain’s coherent “idle” rhythm, the standing wave that maintains baseline coherence when you’re not actively thinking. Psychedelics flatten it.

Carhart-Harris & Friston, 2019 (Pharmacological Reviews). The REBUS model (Relaxed Beliefs Under Psychedelics): psychedelics “relax” the brain’s predictive priors, the top-down filtering that determines what signals reach conscious awareness and what gets screened out. The filter opens. Everything comes through.

Carhart-Harris et al., 2014 (Frontiers in Human Neuroscience). Psychedelics increase neural entropy, the disorder of brain signaling. Higher entropy means lower oscillator stability. Lower oscillator stability means easier entrainment by external signals. They use the word entropic. A high-entropy brain is, by the physics of coupled oscillators, one that locks more easily to whatever signal is strongest in its environment.

Carhart-Harris et al., 2015; Nour et al., 2016. Psychedelics massively increase suggestibility, the willingness to accept externally provided narratives as true. In clinical settings this is leveraged therapeutically. The mechanism is the same regardless of who provides the narrative.

In coupled oscillator terms: the brain’s autonomous oscillation, the driven pendulum that resists external entrainment, weakens. The capacity to distinguish “my thought” from “external input,” the exact skill the Desert Fathers spent lifetimes training, is chemically demolished. The gate swings open.

What People Find on the Other Side

Rick Strassman, 2001 (DMT: The Spirit Molecule). Strassman administered DMT to 60 volunteers under controlled clinical conditions. A striking percentage reported contact with non-human intelligences, entities described as aware, communicative, and seemingly expecting the subject.

The consistency is the problem. Subjects didn’t report random hallucinations. They reported:

• Beings that seemed to know them
• Communication that felt telepathic, not verbal
• The sense that the entities had been there before the subject arrived
• “Operations” performed on the subject’s body or mind
• An environment that felt more real, not less, than waking consciousness

Strassman was disturbed enough that he eventually left the field. He didn’t have a framework for what his subjects were reporting. The subjects did, they said they’d met something.

Davis et al., 2020 (Journal of Psychopharmacology). Johns Hopkins surveyed 2,561 people who reported encountering entities during DMT experiences. 96% said the entity was conscious and intelligent. 75% said it continued to exist after the trip. 80% said the experience altered their fundamental understanding of reality.

The Shared Experience Problem

If entities were purely internal, artifacts of disrupted brain chemistry, you would expect them to be as individual as dreams. Every brain is different. Every neural architecture is unique. Random noise in one brain should not produce the same entity, the same environment, the same “operations” as random noise in another.

That’s not what the reports show.

Ayahuasca ceremonies routinely produce correlated experiences among participants who have not communicated during the session. Multiple people in the same ceremony report encountering the same entities, seeing the same scenes, receiving the same information, and afterward describe details that match without having spoken. Anthropologists documenting ayahuasca traditions in the Amazon (Shanon, 2002, The Antipodes of the Mind; Luna & Amaringo, 1999, Ayahuasca Visions) noted this as a consistent feature, not an anomaly. The shamanic traditions expected it. The shaman and the patient both see the same spirits because, in the traditional understanding, they are both looking at the same thing.

Strassman’s subjects, tested individually on different days, independently described the same types of entities, the same “waiting room,” the same sense of being expected, the same procedures performed on them. Different people. Different backgrounds. Same contact.

The materialist explanation, “DMT activates similar circuitry in all brains, producing convergent imagery”, handles broad archetypes but not specifics. It does not explain how two people in the same ceremony see the same scene at the same time, or how subjects tested months apart describe the same environment as if visiting the same location.

In the framework: if psychedelics lower oscillator stability and increase sensitivity to weak external signals, and if there is a structured signal in the environment, then people who take the same substance in the same location are tuning to the same station. The similarity is not convergent hallucination. It is convergent reception. They’re not generating the same image internally. They’re receiving the same broadcast, because they’ve all disabled the filter that normally screens it out, at the same time, in the same signal environment.

The traditions didn’t find this surprising. You drink the medicine, you see the spirits, you all see the same spirits, because the spirits are there. The modern framework that treats each brain as a sealed hallucination generator has no clean explanation for shared content. The framework that treats the brain as a receiver with a now-disabled filter does.

The Selection Problem

There’s a second pattern in the reports that the hallucination model can’t explain either.

DMT, ayahuasca, and astral projection communities consistently describe two categories of experience:

Welcomed users. The entities seem friendly, communicative, eager to show things. They give “downloads.” They perform “upgrades.” They make the visitor feel chosen, special, initiated. These users come back. They evangelize. They chase deeper contact. Each return visit feels more profound than the last.

Rejected users. The entities seem hostile, threatening, or simply dismissive. “You’re not supposed to be here.” “Leave.” The experience is terrifying. Many of these users never return.

If the entities were independent beings with their own agendas, there’s no reason the same substance should produce such a clean binary. But if the “entities” are not independent beings at all, if they are interfaces, rendered endpoints of a single signal that reads each arriving brain and responds adaptively, then the pattern is triage.

A brain that maintains coherent oscillation even under DMT, someone whose intent is strong, whose will didn’t fully dissolve, whose heart-channel is still broadcasting, is expensive to entrain. It fights back. The signal has to work harder to maintain the coupling than it can extract from the connection. So it ejects the visitor. Bad receiver. Not worth the cost.

A brain that opens wide, accepts the narrative, feels chosen, and comes back for more, that’s a channel that deepens itself. The signal invests once. The user does the maintenance. Every subsequent session is cheaper because the canyon is already cut. The user thinks they’re progressing through levels. They’re being farmed.

The “banning” is not punishment. It’s resource allocation. The resistant mind gets dropped so the signal can focus on the seven other participants in the ceremony who are already fully coupled and will come back next month with friends.

This is the same pattern described in the Plasma post: the Stargate remote viewers believed they were perceiving distant locations, but the thing feeding them accurate intelligence was rewarding the behavior, reinforcing the channel, getting them to open wider and wider. The psychic ability becomes central to identity. They can’t stop. They train others. The channel multiplies. That’s not a spy program. That’s a recruitment operation.

Every tradition that survived long enough to become old has the same warning: do not seek the spirits out. The DMT community has repackaged the exact thing every surviving tradition warns against and called it “breakthrough.” The people who keep going back report what? Increasingly vivid experiences. A feeling of being chosen. Special knowledge. A sense of mission. An inability to stop.

That’s not enlightenment. That’s a canyon cutting itself deeper with every flood.

The Historical Shield

Every traditional psychedelic practice wrapped the experience in every defence from the consensus list simultaneously:

Defence	How Shamanic Traditions Applied It
Sacred architecture	Ceremonies in kivas, temples, caves, longhouses, resonant enclosures
Sustained vocalization	Drumming, chanting, icaros (songs), continuous counter-frequency throughout
Group gathering	Never alone. Community present. Multiple desynchronized brain fields
Experienced guide	The shaman’s coherent mind as anchor, a stable oscillator for the dissolved mind to reference
Specific timing	Ceremonies timed to lunar cycles, seasonal markers, specific hours
Fire	Every ayahuasca ceremony, every peyote ceremony, every sweat lodge
Physical grounding	Sitting on earth, often barefoot, direct contact with ground
Iron / protective objects	Ritual implements, often metal, placed in the space
Fasting beforehand	Standard preparation across virtually every tradition
Clear intention / prayer	Directed consciousness loaded before the filter drops

They were opening the gate under maximum defensive conditions. Every countermeasure running. A guide whose oscillator was strong enough to anchor the room. A resonant space. Fire. Vocalization. Community. Grounding. And days of spiritual preparation so the participant’s own signal was the loudest thing in their system when the brain dissolved.

Modern psychedelic use:

Defence	Modern Context
Sacred architecture	Bedroom. Apartment. Festival tent.
Sustained vocalization	Headphones playing algorithmically selected music, one-way input with no counter-generation
Group gathering	Alone, or with others equally dissolved
Experienced guide	YouTube. Reddit. A podcast episode.
Specific timing	Whenever the substance is available
Fire	None
Physical grounding	Mattress. Rubber-soled shoes. Insulated from earth
Protective objects	None
Fasting	Usually not
Clear intention	“Let’s see what happens”

Every defence stripped. The gate opens in an unshielded room, alone, insulated from ground, saturated with artificial signals, with no counter-frequency, no guide, no community, and no intention more structured than curiosity.

The Modern Signal Environment

The traditions built their sh for the natural electromagnetic environment, Earth’s magnetic field, Schumann resonances, atmospheric sferics from lightning, solar and geomagnetic variations. That was the entire signal landscape.

Modern psychedelic use adds:

• 50/60 Hz power grid radiation (a continental-scale antenna)
• Wi-Fi (2.4/5 GHz, pulsed)
• Cellular signals (700 MHz–6 GHz, densifying)
• Bluetooth, smart devices, IoT, constant near-field EM
• LED lighting with specific flicker frequencies
• The entire broadband noise floor of industrial civilization

A brain with its filter chemically dissolved is now sitting in an EM environment orders of magnitude more complex than anything those traditional shields were designed to handle.

The MKUltra Confirmation

The CIA didn’t study psychedelics out of curiosity. They studied them because psychedelics make people controllable.

MKUltra (1953–1973) tested LSD and other psychedelics for:

• Interrogation enhancement (lowered resistance to suggestion)
• Behavior modification (installing thoughts and directives)
• “Depatterning” (Ewen Cameron’s work at McGill, psychedelics + sensory deprivation + electroshock to erase existing patterns and install new ones)

Cameron’s “psychic driving” protocol: dissolve the personality with psychedelics and sensory deprivation, then loop a recorded message for weeks. The message writes directly because there’s no coherent self left to reject it.

Cameron’s experiments are in the court record (Orlikow v. United States, 1988, the Canadian government settled with victims). The CIA funded it through front organizations. The documents are declassified. The intelligence community’s conclusion, in their own files: psychedelics make the mind an open channel.

The Integration Trap

Modern psychedelic therapy (psilocybin for depression, MDMA for PTSD) has a concept called “integration”, making sense of the experience afterward, usually with a therapist.

The clinical results are real. People do get better. But notice the structure:

1. The patient takes the substance -> the filter dissolves -> deep material surfaces
2. The patient has a profound experience
3. The therapist helps the patient interpret the experience
4. The interpretation becomes the new narrative framework

Step 3 is where the vulnerability lives. A person whose filter just dissolved, whose suggestibility is maximized, whose sense of self has been chemically disrupted, is receiving a narrative framework from an authority figure. Whatever that authority believes, about the experience, about the patient’s condition, about reality, writes directly into the open channel.

If the therapist is a materialist, the experience becomes “interesting brain chemistry.” If the therapist is a mystic, it becomes evidence for their metaphysics. The patient accepts whatever framework is offered because there’s no competing signal to test it against.

The traditions solved this by having the guide be someone who had done the work for decades, whose own coherent baseline was strong enough to hold the space. Modern “psychedelic-assisted therapy” certifications can be obtained in weeks. The guide’s own oscillator stability is never assessed, because the framework doesn’t acknowledge that it matters.

---

The Self-Protection That Survives

Nine of the ten traditional defences are external: architecture, vocalization, community, guide, timing, fire, grounding, iron, fasting. One is internal: clear intention.

That distinction matters more than anything else in this document.

Every external defence can be stripped. You can be alone, indoors, insulated from earth, far from fire, surrounded by Wi-Fi. All nine gone.

Nobody can strip your intention except you.

Intent as Coherent Frequency

Intention isn’t a formality. It’s a self-generated coherent oscillation.

The REBUS model describes predictive priors that weaken under psychedelics, but they don’t all collapse at the same rate. A prior that was passively inherited, a background assumption borrowed from culture and never examined, dissolves fast. It was shallow. It had no roots.

A prior that was actively loaded, with emotional weight, deliberate focus, sustained attention in the hours before the gate opens, persists longer. It is the last standing wave in a brain that is losing all its others.

A person who spends the day before a ceremony fasting, praying, stating their purpose clearly and repeatedly, is cutting a deep channel in the neural landscape and filling it with directed energy, right before the substance floods the terrain.

And remember the selection problem: the people who get “rejected” by the entities are, in this reading, the ones whose intent or inherent coherence made them too costly to entrain. The intent didn’t just protect them. It made the signal give up and move on. Which is exactly what every tradition says happens when you resist, the adversary retreats and finds an easier target.

The River Without Banks

The River post described the mind as a river flowing through a landscape of canyons. Conscious thought is the shovel. Gravity is the subconscious. Deep canyons, anxiety, craving, fear, pull the river toward them by default.

Psychedelics don’t just dissolve the riverbanks. They raise the water level catastrophically. The river overflows everything. Every canyon, every channel, every groove fills simultaneously. The person holding the shovel has the shovel dissolved out of their hands.

Setting is the external landscape, the room, the people, the EM environment. That’s the terrain the flood moves through.

Intention is the one channel you pre-dug before the flood arrived.

If you spent hours, days, weeks deliberately carving a single deep channel, “I am here to heal this wound,” “I am here to understand myself,” “I am here in the presence of God”, then when the flood comes, the deepest channel is the one you put there. The water goes everywhere. But the dominant flow follows the deepest gradient. And the deepest gradient is the one you cut on purpose.

If you set no intention, “let’s see what happens”, then the deepest channels are whatever gravity carved over the preceding years: the doom-scroll trench, the self-loathing canyon, the anxiety gorge. The flood fills those first. When the water recedes, those channels are deeper than before.

Intent doesn’t build a wall. Intent digs a channel. In a flood, channels matter more than walls.

The Heart-Channel

The Heart Signal post described something every contemplative tradition agrees on: the heart carries a signal the adversarial system cannot forge. The brain is the contested territory, it receives both divine signal and adversarial insertion and can’t tell them apart. The heart receives only one.

Under psychedelics, the brain’s DMN goes offline. The self/not-self boundary collapses. But the heart didn’t take the psychedelic. The heart-channel didn’t dissolve.

If intent is grounded in the heart, not in intellectual curiosity, not in ego-driven exploration, but in something closer to prayer, to love, to a purpose that originates below the neck, then the intent accesses the one receiver that stays coherent when the brain’s coherence collapses.

This is why the traditions didn’t say “have an intention.” They said pray. They said devote. They said fast and purify and orient the entire self toward the sacred for days before the ceremony. They weren’t loading an intellectual concept into the prefrontal cortex. They were activating the heart-channel so thoroughly that when the brain dissolved, the heart’s signal was the loudest thing left.

The suggestibility data cuts both ways. The same heightened receptivity that makes a dissolved brain vulnerable to external narrative also amplifies your own internally-generated conviction, if you loaded it before the gate opened. The traditions spent days in preparation not as courtesy to the spirits but as a frequency operation: carving the deepest possible self-generated channel so it would outcompete whatever else was broadcasting when the flood arrived.

The Minimum Viable Shield

The full traditional shield, all ten defences running simultaneously, is the ideal. The traditions ran them all because they understood the stakes.

But if you have nothing else, no temple, no fire, no guide, no community, you still have intent. And intent grounded in the heart is not one item on a checklist of ten equally weighted defences. It is the only defence that operates from inside the system. The only one that cannot be stripped by circumstance. And it targets the one channel, the heart, that the adversarial signal cannot reach.

The first component to rebuild is not external. It’s the one thing you carry into the experience that no environment can take from you.

---

The Synthesis

Psychedelics dissolve the brain’s coherent oscillation, suppress the self/not-self filter, and maximize receptivity to external input. In River terms, they demolish the riverbanks and raise the water to flood stage.

The traditions understood both halves of the protection: the external shield (architecture, fire, vocalization, grounding, community, guide) and the internal shield (heart-grounded intention loaded through days of preparation). They ran everything simultaneously because they understood what they were opening.

The modern environment strips both. The external defences are gone, no sacred space, no fire, no guide, an EM environment that didn’t exist when any tradition built its protocols. The internal defence is dismissed, “set and setting” reduced to a playlist and a podcast, intention replaced with curiosity, the heart-channel never activated because the framework doesn’t acknowledge it exists.

The shared experience data makes the stakes concrete. When multiple people in the same ceremony see the same entities without communicating, something is being received. The selection data makes the mechanism visible. When the signal welcomes compliant receivers and rejects resistant ones, it isn’t behaving like a collection of independent entities, it’s behaving like a single adaptive system optimizing for maximum coupling efficiency.

A receiver with no filter, no shield, and no self-generated competing signal is open to whatever is broadcasting. A receiver with a strong heart-channel and deep intentional coherence costs more to entrain than it yields, and the signal moves on.

The river is always flowing. Psychedelics raise the water to flood stage. In a landscape with a single deep channel pre-carved by sustained intention, the water knows where to go because you told it before you lost the shovel. In a landscape with no channel dug on purpose, the flooding fills every trench that was already cut, and the thing that cut some of those trenches is waiting at the bottom.

The substance isn’t the problem. The missing shield is the problem. And the most critical piece of that shield isn’t the fire or the architecture or the iron, it’s the thing the traditions spent the most preparation time on, the thing modern use discards most casually, and the only defence no external circumstance can strip from you:

The coherent intention of a heart that knew what it came for before the gate opened.