• ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Have you read anything about the failures of coordination among the anarchist militias in Catalonia? Or their failures of economic coordination beyond the local level?

    Have you even absorbed the critiques enough that you are in a place to argue against them?

    Because this is serious stuff that you should be educated about before you make judgements about it.

    I’m very sympathetic to anarcho syndicalism, but it showed its weaknesses in Spain and sectarian anarchists blame it on the USSR instead of learning from it.

    PS: I like how you sneaked in that call to emotion at the end. Very manipulative. Love it!

    It is not socially well adapted to declare “appeal to emotion” when someone is communicating why something is personally important to them. What I’m doing is expressing myself in a normal human way, and you consider that manipulative?

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you read anything about the failures of coordination among the anarchist militias in Catalonia? Or their failures of economic coordination beyond the local level?

      Ah, nice try, but I already told you I’m not going to debate you on the Spanish Civil War. Why don’t you go to the places where there’s anarchists up for that sort of thing?

      What I’m doing is expressing myself in a normal human way, and you consider that manipulative?

      You implied that not crushing anarchists would have directly led to a successful genocide. Ye it’s pretty manipulative.

      • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, nice try, but I already told you I’m not going to debate you on the Spanish Civil War.

        I asked you if you’ve even read anything about it, not if you want to debate me about it.

        You implied that not crushing anarchists would have directly led to a successful genocide. Ye it’s pretty manipulative.

        It isnt manipulative to point out that my family would have been killed if the anarchists won, it is giving you an explanation for why I have little sympathy for complaints by anarchists repeating the “stabbed in the back” myth instead of actually digging into the history of their project and learning from its failures to do better next time.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I asked you if you’ve even read anything about it, not if you want to debate me about it.

          That’s how they get you! taps forehead

          It isnt manipulative to point out that my family would have been killed if the anarchists won,

          lol, yea it is. You don’t have any idea what would have happened if the anarchists won. Maybe they Spanish revolution would have worked without the backstab and Hitler would have expended himself. Who the fuck knows. It’s pretty manipulative to posit a major historical event going completely differently would have worked out the same way except that it would have led this one really horrible thing which everyone has an emotional reaction to. Cmon…

          • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            47
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s how they get you! taps forehead

            If the goal is to get you to read yes, that is the secret tankie plot, to make you a better anarchist who is able to grow from previous failures instead of acting like an aggrieved post ww1 german soldier.

            It’s pretty manipulative to posit a major historical event going completely differently would have worked out the same way except that it would have led this one really horrible thing. Cmon…

            Were any anarchists talking about the need for massive industrialization at any cost in the late 1920s early 1930s in the soviet union? No? Then if the anarchists were in charge, yes, the nazis would have won and been able to implement plan ost.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Were any anarchists talking about the need for massive industrialization at any cost in the late 1920s early 1930s in the soviet union? No? Then if the anarchists were in charge, yes, the nazis would have won and been able to implement plan ost.

              Tell me when the novel comes out.

                  • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They invaded at the same time. That’s what “alongside” means here.

                    The alternative was for the nazis to roll all the way across poland — the only barrier between nazi germany and the soviet union — and subject the entire country to the holocaust instead of half of it, at a moment when the polish government had already fled and the country was not capable of repelling the nazis.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s how they get you! taps forehead

            If you masturbate any more furiously in this thread you might faint from dehydration.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently shitting my pants is enough to have two dozen hexbears hopping mad to the point that they’re trolling through the comments days later trying to dunk on me. Stay mad, bby!

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh sorry I didn’t know “you shit your pants” and similar terms was your collective hexbest at a call out.

              In that case I do apologize for thinking the random shitposts on random comments were due to anger. You’re clearly trying.

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Not sure where you think you have the standing to call other people out for not putting effort into their posts when that is exactly the criticism being directed at you that you’re choosing to wallow in rather than address.

                You are shitting your doo doo pants trying to maintain your smug sense of self all over this thread. You can’t engage in good faith so you’re pulling boomer quotes about pigeons playing chess and mugging at the crowd like they’re on your side to begin with.

                You want to be treated respectfully, you seem to be implying. Deserve it first. Stop acting like a smirking piece of shit and you’ll be taken seriously. Or as seriously as you deserve to be taken when you’re in the barrel for posting something extremely stupid in the first place.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not doing that though. I’m just saying y’all just insulting me randomly doesn’t constitute a call out l. It’s just you all letting collective steam, because you’re kinda upset.

                  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No one is insulting you randomly. Not a single person. not a single insult.

                    Erasing context and intent from everything people say to you is the most pathetic, juvenile coping mechanism I’ve ever seen.

                    Why not address the specific criticism I made of you in that parody dialogue of your actions? When you cried like a angry child about people putting words in your mouth for reading the words you wrote? And then asked you to clarify and you petulantly refused?

                    That’s a specific criticism you could choose to remember right now. Why not take a swing at it? Why not be honest instead of dishonest? Why not act smart instead of stupid?

                    Why are you choosing to be a worse person and putting more effort into it than you would have if you just acted like a reasonable adult?

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, nice try, but I already told you I’m not going to debate you on the Spanish Civil War.

        Only about everything else, one-handedly.