• Evil_Shrubbery
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    wiki/La_Jamais_Contente

    The vehicle had two Postel-Vinay 25 kW motors, each driving the rear axle via a chain, running at 200 V and drawing 124 A each, for about 68 hp total, and was equipped with Michelin tires.

    The benchmark to beat was this at 92.69 km/h:

    The 1899 Jeantaud Duc Profilée was powered by a 26.8 kW (35.9 hp) electric engine. The car weighed around 1,400 kg (3,100 lb) and transmitted its power to the rear wheels through a chain-drive gearbox. The Profilée was designed to be more aerodynamic than its older brother, featuring pointed ends on both the front and back, which allowed it to break the record top speed of 79 km/h (49 mph) of its less aerodynamic rival the GCA Dogcart on 4 March 1899, achieving a speed of 92 km/h (57 mph).

    • Tiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s awesome. Also shows how much oil companies have hindered the development of electric vehicles. Every other tech has 100x in 125 years, electric vehicles only became somewhat mainstream in the last 10-15?

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Batteries have limited the development of electric vehicles. The only reason why battery research existed was consumer electronics. As for the motors, they really have not changed much in 125 years because they are already very efficient.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wish one of the pages would list how that weight is distributed along the different parts. I would wager half of that weight, 700kg, was the battery, with the electric engine being ~250kg.

          • Evil_Shrubbery
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That’s due to the materials, cooling, & intended (decades of continuous, low-vibration, & safe industrial?) use - the one you linked has a cast iron frame, which is prob the majority of those 200kg.

            Here is a random example (bcs there is a table included with power & weight) under 100kg that looks about the same: globalsources.com/permanent-magnet-motor_1210699575f.htm.

            But I def don’t know anything about electric motors 120 years ago, what was available, how the rich kids did their hobbies, etc.
            And I do agree that the 250 estimate might not be too much - however that means that the car was unbalanced af & the driver had to sit on the opposite side of the (initially one) electric motor to provide counterbalance (instead of the motor just being mounted in the centre of the car) nvm, it had two.

    • dmention7@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I thought the same thing at first too, but I think in that photo he’s sitting up on the edge of the “cockpit”. I’ll bet the actual driving position is further down inside the body with that wheel closer to shoulder level.

      Edit: I would lose that bet! Found modern photo

    • Yosmonkol@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      If all we knew were horse drawn wagons and carriages this seating arrangement might seem more normal.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          It still gives me flashbacks to the PC game Mafia. There was a mission in that game where you drove a 1930s era open wheel racing car, without roll bars or anything. It was super easy to take a corner too fast and roll the thing. Your body snapped like a twig every time!