This project does not allow contributions generated by large languages models (LLMs). We are taking these steps due to:

  • The potential negative influence of AI generated content on quality, developer alienation from their code and skill rot.
  • Legal complications such as the inability to claim copyright and ensure others’ licensing and copyright have not been violated.
  • Ethical concerns including but not limited to those regarding intellectual property theft, environmental impact, the effect on already-marginalized groups, devaluing labor for the purpose of concentrating power among the billionaire class, etc.

This ban of AI generated content applies to all parts of the project, including, but not limited to, code, documentation, issues, and artworks. An exception applies for translating texts for issues, discussions, and their comments to English.

  • 鴉河雛(Karasugawa)@PieFed@pf.korako.meEnglish
    221·
    4 days ago

    Previously, when AI-related discussions came up, I was using AI to translate my posts into English. I was concerned about becoming a target because of that, so I ended up closing all my issues and stopped participating in the chat.

    It helps a lot that translation into English has now been explicitly allowed as an exception.

    • homes@piefed.worldEnglish
      84·
      3 days ago

      Out of curiosity, are non-AI tools like translate.google.com insufficient for your needs?

      Edit: never mind. Apparently, Google translate uses Google‘s internally developed LLMs since 2020. :/

        • homes@piefed.worldEnglish
          33·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, that’s definitely part of their internally developed LLM. I remember reading about Google developing this when I was in design school. I just didn’t know that Google translate was using it, too, but I suppose I should’ve known.

          Thanks for posting this.

          • 鴉河雛(Karasugawa)@PieFed@pf.korako.meEnglish
            2·
            3 days ago

            I use Google Translate when reading, but I still feel that Japanese translations are not always perfect.

            For writing, I usually translate with ChatGPT, then check it again by retranslating into Japanese with DeepL, and pick the version that feels the most natural.

            • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.socialEnglish
              1·
              2 days ago

              As someone that has English as second language, but Japanese not as my third, I like how grok AI translation works. Although confirming it with English speaking Japanese acquaintance they say while it is generally slightly better than google translate or deepL it is still wrong in a few ways often enough.

              I say grok because there’s still a lot of Japanese artists (singing and drawing) and vtubers that still use twitter. It annoys me greatly but I understand why they still stay on Twitter for the audience, but especially for the drawing artists I don’t fully understand (or refuse to accept), twitter has repeatedly say they WILL steal their artwork to train grok.

              If they jumped ship to misskey or something with a big Japanese audience on fediverse, I’d make it my mission to understand the micro blogging section of the fediverse lol

              I’m more of a topic follower rather than people follower on fediverse so Lemmy, piefed, mbin is still my preferred home

            • homes@piefed.worldEnglish
              23·
              3 days ago

              I don’t particularly like ChatGPT. I tend to favor Claude just because it’s far less obsequious and tends to give a bit more pushback and is more critical.

              I also like the structure of it answers a bit more. Maybe it’s just a matter of taste, but I really don’t trust an LLM model that keeps kissing my ass so much.

  • Emotional_Series7814@piefed.zipEnglish
    7·
    4 days ago

    Happy to see this.

    kvetching over negativity

    Wish it got as many upvotes as the “AI did a bad thing/is invading everything” headlines, but alas, good news hacks your brain to engage far less than something you’re mad at.

  • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    3 days ago

    “Intellectual property theft” isn’t a thing. The correct terms are “copyright infringement” or “trademark infringement” or “plagiarism” or something like that, and you should be specific about which you’re talking about.

  • HubertManne@piefed.socialEnglish
    3·
    3 days ago

    Thanks. I will give my peanut gallery perspective. This is a social software and its good its made by people. Its good enough as it is now and it will be great if it gets better but there is no urgent timeline to do so. Its better the improvements be things people like so much that someone wants to get it working. I think of it like a club. You can be a member and show up and have fun but you can volunteer for setup and such and that can be fun in its own way and you can become part of the leadership or start your own or whatever. This is not a corporation that needs to make profits. It should happen in a cummunal human like way.

  • Retail4068@lemmy.worldEnglish
    318·
    4 days ago

    Ahhh more unenforceable prejudice. I’m sure that’s going to keep the project strong.