• blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Often times the chubby girl was the big titty goth girl you were always looking for.

  • CryptidBestiary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Whenever someone rates people like that on these green texts, often than not, they’re the problem. Also did the OP just want someone to take care of him like a child? 2.5/10 too whiny

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fundamentally, this is a problem that has to do with rating women, and that too purely based on their external appearance.

  • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    We all make this mistake when we’re young and stupid. It’s how we grow up. Looks aren’t everything. They’re temporary at best.

    • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was in high school, she was a chubby amd adorable native american girl with waist length black hair. I left her for someone more conventially pretty. I’m a dumbass.

    • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of my favorite things about polyamorous people is how they can never fucking shut their goddamn mouths and trying to insert their bullshit everywhere.

        • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re are two types of polyamorous people, and they’re both mentally unwell.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Much like the… lovely lady or gentleman above, that’s a bit reductive. There’s no one true style of relationship, and tossing out polyamory as bad and wrong, or monogamy as antithetical to humans base drives both miss out on the fundamental truth that no one solution works for everyone. The worst of both camps are those who try to say they’re right and the other cannot work.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a bit reductive isn’t it? I’m all for consensual and open polyamory, but what problem, exactly, is solved in this by polyamory? If either party wants monogamy, which is a fairly safe assumption in the world today, then the polyamory just becomes lying, and that doesn’t help anyone.

      • morphballganon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you assume lying is involved, then that’s not polyamory, it’s cheating.

        The important thing to understand here is that monogamy is a human construct, encouraged by people with self-serving agendas. It had to be learned. It can be unlearned.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right. The reductive part is assuming this problem would be solved by polygamy, when realistically there’s nothing at all showing that’s the case, except that there’s a guy who wants multiple women for different reasons. We only know that he wants that, but nothing of the motives and desires of the others, and thus it’s reductive to say “polygamy fixes this”.

          • morphballganon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your change in verbiage from polyamory to polygamy demonstrates you have no interest in critical inquiry, you just want to argue.

            • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And your complete dismissal over a simple typographic error demonstrates that you never intended to have an actual discussion. I had actually edited my post to polygamy because I had, inaccurately, recalled you using that word. At the end of the day, polyamory and polygamy, yes they’re distinct. It doesn’t change my statement regardless of which is used, however.