An example of stunningly blatant disinformation and obsufucation put out by a dead husk of a political party.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 天前

    An example of stunningly blatant disinformation and obsufucation put out by a dead husk of a political party.

    You mean stunningly blatant disinformation and obfuscation commissioned by the dead husk of a political party, but then forced to be released against the will of the replacement party leadership that correctly disavows it.

    In fact, by refusing to acknowledge the vast difference between the old DNC leadership and the new, the article itself is peddling disinformation.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 天前

      I see no evidence the new leadership is materially different, especially to the degree that is necessary. The DNC has been drowned by a class of people who cannot risk winning in a way that de-legitimizes their entire political ideology and there is no turning back from the kind of fatal momentum that creates.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        I see no evidence the new leadership is materially different, especially to the degree that is necessary.

        Sure, just completely fucking ignore the fact that the chair agrees the report is bullshit, which is exactly why he tried to ditch it in the first place!

        You hate the old DNC, and do so for good reason, but you’re so blinded by it that you don’t even fucking realize that you’re now hating the new DNC led by entirely different people who agree with you!

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 天前

          you’re now hating the new DNC led by entirely different people who agree with you

          no we’re saying the current DNC leadership is entirely uninterested in actually doing a fucking report, and the fact they wasted how many months and $$$$ on first commissioning and then trying to surpress this steaming pile of shit is damning enough on its own.

          An 8th grader is held to higher standards than that drivel was. And there has been no evidence the DNC has improved under the new leadership in any dimension. they still suppress any criticism of gaza, there has been no change in rhetoric around middle class economic policy.

          its pathetic. what a competent group of people should have done was immediately publish the piece of toilet paper that it is and said ‘we’re commissioning a real one’ and start the fuck over and ban the moron and anyone associated with that report from ever being involved w/ the DNC again.