For context, LDAC is one of the few wireless audio codecs stamped Hi-Res by the Japan Audio Society and its encoder is open source since Android 8, so you can see just how long Windows is sleeping on this. I’m excited about the incoming next gen called LC3plus, my next pair is definitely gonna have that.

  • denny@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes… I made double sure to mention ‘encoder’ between that.

    Xiph really won the lossy codec scene with Opus and I transcoded all my junk to that format. Hitting (my personal) transparency on 128k vbr is flat out impressive and it warms my heart that corpos won’t have a reason to collect taxes for basic things like audio codec. However it’s a different story with bluetooth audio codec in which I hope will change.

    • Deathcrow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Xiph really won the lossy codec scene with Opus and I transcoded all my junk to that format. Hitting (my personal) transparency on 128k vbr is flat out impressive

      Same here. I’ve left myself a bit of a safety margin at 144k vbr, but having my whole library at transparent quality AND portable size is very convenient.

      Though, now that opus 1.4 is out I feel a bit of anxiety whether i should re-encode everything from flac->opus1.4

      • madeindjs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which tool do you use to re-encode everything to opus ?

        I tried with ffmpeg and it works but I had many issues with covers.

        • TwinTurbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Use opusenc directly. It preserves covers and the CLI is literally opusenc --bitrate B INPUT OUTPUT.

        • denny@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I use foobar2k via wine. Yes, you may stone me. Tip: You will save heaps of space by not embedding the cover on each file, just put a cover.jpg in the albums folder, virtually any player will pick it up.

          • Deathcrow@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tip: You will save heaps of space by not embedding the cover on each file, just put a cover.jpg in the albums folder, virtually any player will pick it up.

            Except when streaming the file or copying a random file to another location. embedded art is pretty convenient, 500x500 is plenty large enough and doesn’t take a lot of space (~50KB)

        • Deathcrow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          same as @[email protected] I use foobar2000 + wine. ffmpeg is alright, but fb2k is very convenient (especially for replaygain tagging). Afterwards I usually give the files a Picard treatment to get proper tags + covers.

            • Deathcrow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              does it support foobar2000 plugins?

              probably not, since those are windows dlls. So here’s a short list of what I’d want from a fb2k replacement:

              • a UI plugin with the power and flexibility of Facets/Refacets
              • browse library by folder structure OR tags (most only do one or the other)
              • powerful query language to actually find what I’m looking for
              • binaural stereo for headphones plugin
              • convolver
              • convert to opus and replaygain scanning
              • DR Meter
              • handle my >100k tracks library without constantly crashing or being incredibly slow

              Most alternatives I’ve tried can’t even deliver on half of those.

      • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because 75MB an album is better than 400MB when you’re trying to pack them on a mobile device. Flac is for archival.

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Totally get this, but doesn’t it just matter less over time? 400 megs in my pocket would have been unthinkable some years ago, but now that I’ve got a 500GB SD card, I care a lot less (and thus, why transcode)?

          And data storage is always getting cheaper, not the other way around.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Transcoding to a (for them) transparent lossy result is perfectly fine if all you do is listen. I couldn’t care less about “audio qualities” that I cannot hear.