You must log in or # to comment.
Honestly, it could be a data point added because the researcher was getting really pissed off at the plotting software truncating the axis strangely. Normally you’d remove that after the fact, but…
Or it’s a data oddity, like someone who specified units incorrectly (mg/mL) instead of (ug/L).
styropyro
He has some mystery condition where his testosterone is super high… He’s very smart, but maybe not quite there.
high five, random internet poster. I came here to make a similar comment :)
Tbh if you told me there’s a STEM youtuber with worryingly high levels of testosterone, Styropyro would be my first guess
That’s literally who I thought about and I’m so glad someone mentioned it. He’s a freakishly smart dude.
How is he now btw? Is he getting treated? Did they find a root cause?
He’s posted very little on it. Last we heard they didn’t find any cancers or anything and he wasn’t really suffering from it. He had some strange symptoms and it it just came up in tests that didn’t like up with what he was there for. But it was really really high.
Well, as long as it isn’t negatively affecting him I guess. But I assume that he’ll have to somewhat regularly monitor it with bloodwork checkups
Yeah, we have to assume he’s in good hands. No good to assume anything else
I guess I’ll just assume what the x axis is…
That’s just John Testosterone, we don’t talk about him.
Professor John Testosterone.
What happened to his face?
A stressful residency
might be styropyro who has mentioned a clinical testosterone disorder affecting videos recently
Obviously it’s Brian Boitano
I bet on Dulph Lundgren
And that man? Luigi
Is it this guy? I’ve always imagined him as an erudite scholar.
Dolph Lundgren?
Not a real study but okay
That is Testosterone Georg, who is an outlier and should not be counted
It is obviously John Carmack
