• Baku@aussie.zoneOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, I’m not sure I think hydrogen is the best option honestly. It seems like a lot of effort to go to, and certainly more than chicken some solar panels and a few batteries at a depot/on buses

    • AJ Sadauskas@aus.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @Baku @Railison Burning methane (“natural”) gas to make hydrogen to run a bus really isn’t much of a step forward, if your aim is to reduce emissions.

      Some solar panels and a battery would be a much better option.

      From TFA:

      "But Guardian Australia understands the buses will run on grey hydrogen, produced using natural gas.

      “Currently about 96% of the world’s hydrogen is produced using coal (brown hydrogen) and gas (grey). The production of grey and brown hydrogen releases carbon dioxide and unburnt fugitive methane into the atmosphere.”

      #bus #vicpol #climate #methane #ClimateChange #PublicTransport #melbourne #environment #auspol

    • Andrew Bartlett@mastodon.nzoss.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @Baku @Railison Battery electric busses are a well established technology, used widely, normally hard to get grants for.

      Despite this they got a 50 bus grants for the battery technology, plus 2 for hydrogen. If you want to get free money for these things it needs to be novel, and H2 is.

      Regardless, anything is better than diesel. I ride my bike on a now almost all electric bus route. I hold my breath much less often now. The reduced particulates is enough to show in the graphs for Wellington