• imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    US party shifts are interesting, but not as radical as they sound.

    Branding is important, so they switched names often enough,.but the south was historically and is still conservative, and small government, while the north was historically and is still relatively progressive and big government.

    Well, except Republicans are now big government…

    • Paul Giulan@federate.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      @imeansurewhynot to your point, the Progressive Party was born out of the Republican Party in the north; it was after the New Deal that Republicans became known as conservatives for opposing it, which I find really interesting. Conversely, Democrats were conservatives in the south, but became liberals ever since supporting the New Deal.

      #USpol #history

        • Paul Giulan@federate.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          @imeansurewhynot

          I speculate that Trump is playing a similar role as FDR in flipping each party’s form of government and serving more than 2 terms to get it done lol. Trump would flip the Republican Party back to centralized government and the Democrat Party back to decentralized government. If not during his presidency, I think at some point the flip will happen back to how it was in the First Party System.

          • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            ha, oh you nailed it! I couldn’t figure out exactly how those puzzle pieces fit together, but that’s exactly it.

            Great insight.