Normalize telling AI artists nothing, because they aren’t artists, and AI doesn’t have feelings.
Their work 🤣
Normalize not arguing about this until they have released the Epstein files. Culture war distractions.
Normalise telling artists they’re AI hacks when they aren’t using AI. Oh wait… Mission accomplished.
Edit: Apparently I’m getting downvoted by a bunch of clueless folk who aren’t aware of the problem artists are facing.
https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1164/when-online-commenters-detect-my-art-as-ai
It’s an actual problem actual artists are facing. More than AI itself, witch hunts are screwing them over.
deleted by creator
Yeah I’m dumb. Even the artists themselves are making strips complaining they’re being unfairly accused of using AI, and I’m the one who’s dumb 🙄
deleted by creator
Here dumbass, educate yourself
https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1164/when-online-commenters-detect-my-art-as-ai
It’s an actual problem actual artists are facing, and idiots like you are making their lives harder.
Did you run out of ‘witty’ comebacks? Maybe you can ask chatgpt how to get out of the corner you’ve backed yourself into?
The model is the artist, the prompt generator is rarely the artist unless they spend hours fine tuning their image
fine tuning their image
I meant more along the lines of selecting parts, regenerating, using specific loras, altering the prompt and negative prompt, shading in parts for contextual generation, etc, using something like Krita with the AI Diffusion plugin
I feel like that would be considered creative work
In real audio, that would barely be enough for a producer credit
Prompting a fucking computer will never be art
No one creating “AI art” is doing that though. That sounds an awful lot like “actual work”, which is the thing AI “artists” are trying to avoid.
Modeling a turd may become a sculpture but it is still shit.
I feel like that would be considered creative work
you need to do some actual creative work and come back to reevaluate.
