Hi /r/HomeNetworking,

I currently have a 1,200Mbs plan (via Comcast) and I’m wanting to upgrade my equipment to accommodate 2.5Gbs speeds.

Existing Setup:

I have a 1Gb Motorola modem and three TP-Link Deco x20’s [wired backhaul]. I get 900+ DL / 40+ UL [wired], and average 400 DL / 20 UL [wireless]

What I am considering

  1. A 2.5Gbs modem (Motorola makes one, and also the Arris S33)

  2. A TP-Link Deco x55 Pro (has two 2.5 ports, so one from modem and the other for wired backhaul)

  3. Two TP-Link Deco XE75 Pro’s (each has a single 2.5 port), connected via a wired backhaul

  4. A 10G switch {Modem > Router > Switch > Each Deco unit}

Reasoning:

I’ve been using TP-Link products for a while and I like their Deco mesh systems. The most complex networking configs I would need would be simple port forwarding, channel adjustments, and so forth. While I will happily accept having a setup which allows for more networking monitoring and tinkering, I simply don’t think I’ll need it.

What I use my network for:

  1. Homelab stuff, like running my own NAS for backups, a Jellyfin server, etc.

  2. Occasional gaming, but mostly streaming content from my server

  3. The great majority of devices are wired (Cat6), with the exception of phones and laptops.

Conclusion:

Is my proposal viable? Am I missing something here? Is there a better option available? I’ve seen TP-Link’s EAP-series access points and Omada setups - is it worth it given what I need my network for? I suppose I would be ‘future proofing’ myself, if I wanted to learn more and do more - but I just don’t see that happening anytime soon.

Thank you all for your time!

  • Mission_Extreme_6448@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I would recommend against a 2.5Gb setup.

    I personally did go for a 2.5Gb setup and speeds in my neighbourhood have since increased to 4Gb and now 6Gb symmetrical. I had to replace the 2.5Gb switches and router with 10Gb ones only about 14 months later.