How it used to look:

A better world exists if you want it.

  • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s starting to happen in car heavy San Antonio, TX too and I’m here for it. It’s amazing how, once a city hits a certain population threshold, it’s feasible to have these central squares where motor vehicle transport can be rare and bike/walk friendly places can still thrive. Europe has adopted it for decades, if not centuries. Now, finally, the other half of the western world is learning from them.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Shout out to Mendoza, Argentina, designed with several plazas regularly spaced throughout its area. Pretty much anyone in the central area can walk to a park with a fountain and be isolated from car traffic; but it’s never too late start banning cars!

      • Geobloke@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Adelaide, Australia is similar. The central city is surrounded by parkland which is mostly public with a central shopping street blocked off from cats. The city can be accessed easily by train, tram or bus!

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Mendoza was rebuild after an earthquake with very wide streets to protect people from falling debris. I think it’s as walkable as it gets but I have never been to another city re-built so recently. I would like to see how it compares.

  • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Since people usually quibble and kvetch about fair comparisons based on cloudy vs. sunny, or camera angles making the favored photo look better (as if a car sewer would be meaningfully improved with better lighting), I’ll get in on the action (tongue in cheek-style):

    This comparison isn’t fair, as it makes the car-less space look empty and desolate. All of the people are far from the camera, tucked in the background, while the cars are in the foreground, making it look well-traveled and vibrant. Never mind that there are probably lots more people in the ‘after’ image. (It’s hard to say for sure, because of the bus, ironically. Clearly a lot more people strolling than in the cars.)