• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wut

    Releasing all prisoners at once is simply the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Dumbest thing [you] ever heard” is entirely different from “completely impossible,” you know.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Obviously it’s “possible” to unlock all the doors and walk away.

        Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Actually no its not possible to do that because if you do that some of the prisoners will become the new jailers.

          What I’m saying is that it is not actually possible for everyone to be free, because there are some people who aren’t the government who will actively kidnap and imprison other people.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Obviously it’s “possible” to unlock all the doors and walk away.

          Thank you for admitting you were wrong.

          Whatcha gonna do with all the actual, legitimate violent criminals who just got dumped back into society all at once?

          How the fuck should I know? It wasn’t my idea, nor did I endorse it.

          • GBU_28@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Alright Copernicus, clearly the suggestion that it was “impossible” related to the unacceptable nature of releasing all criminals without review.

            Agree that if you enforce childish semantic literalism then yes, I was wrong. But if you have at least two functioning neurons you’d understand quite clearly what was going on.

            Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

              You get what you give, buddy.

              • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Refuting a nonsensical idea as impossible is not “being petty”. My short response at most was “being curt” or “dismissive”.

                You are too dumb to be in my life. See ya