GrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前Google loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1180arrow-down13 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkGoogle loses antitrust case vs Epic Games. Jury rules Google Play store constitutes an illegal monopolywww.theverge.comGrappleHat@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 年前message-square35fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarebionicjoey@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·1 年前How exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
How exactly does a jury trial work in a case like this? Aren’t juries supposed to be “peers” of the accused? How can a corporation be tried by a jury of its peers?
In the US, corporations are people
Yeah but who are their peers?
deleted
Going off history, fascist dictators.