• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    11 months ago

    Exactly why I didn’t bring it up.

    Still haven’t addressed the methodology of the “real” astrologers in that study, and again, still not relevant.

    Read this once again, slowly:

    I did not claim astrology was accurate.

    My claim was that it was not -always- vague.

    A report does not have to be accurate to be specific.

    You are arguing against a claim I did not make instead of the one I did make.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      1·
      11 months ago

      Read the paper.

      And just because you read something as specific does not make it specific. I already sent you information about the Barnum effect, which you repeatedly ignored.

      You know nothing of science, how dare you make any claims that I do not.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        1·
        11 months ago

        There it is again, diverting from my actual position to argue again something else.

        Since obviously you flunked middle school science:

        Precision =/= accuracy. You continue to argue against the accuracy of astrology, which was not a part of my position.