• randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does win 11 still require physical hardware to run? Why I have to sacrifice one of my motherboard slots for a worthless authentication chip that might stop working and brick my computer - ya I’ll stay with 10.

      • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s built into my CPU but for some reason MS doesn’t trust the Intel Core i7 chips.

      • randon31415@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Strange, I thought it was a standard header. Why I bought 10 instead of 11 when building my computer.

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s either the LPC header or it’s soldered onto the board directly. LPC header doesn’t have any other *official uses so it’s not sacrificing functionality. Though I can understand why somebody wouldn’t want to have a TPM module on their board. It’s pretty easy to bypass that requirement in Windows (over and over) though.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re not sacrificing a slot. TPM chips are typically either soldered onto the motherboard, built into the chipset, or (in the few instances that they are optional) go in a special port just fir them.

      There are plenty of reasons not to move to W11 without making up new ones.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Technically it’s an artificial requirement, it’ll run just fine without secure boot and TPM, you’ll just need to do some work around to install it that way.