• The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    They’re trying to authoritarian their way out of a massive speculation bubble.

    I don’t think it will work, unless you can will away a black hole. Debt is a kind of gravity.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      You mean if you can pick up enough speed in the transverse direction you can circle around it and never hit it?

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      If they’re external creditors, it makes it a lot easier for them to go “nope, not paying that, what are you going to do?” when they’re one massive state-backed monolith.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think if they started working towards it, China would feel forced to step up their reunification efforts. If a nuclear deterrent is going to be a viable path back to a stable status quo, it will have to be a fait accompli with external help.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sovereign default is a thing. It’s a short term solution that can get a country out of immediate danger, but has very negative long term effects.

    • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      that depends on who the creditors are and how they demand payment. a pound of flesh or a dove feather. evergrande went bust at the same time china became the world biggest auto exporter. i think china participation in the global economy demands new economic theories, considering the promiscuity between the public sector and the “private” sector.

      • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        China became one of the world’s largest exporters of electric cars because their domestic market for vehicles has crashed. Now their industry is dumping cars in foreign markets to try and stay solvent.

        The US has closed its markets to Chinese cars with high tariffs. That has left the EU as a dumping ground for Chinese high end EVs and the rest of the 3rd world for everything else. This is not sustainable, the EU will eventually block Chinese imports to protect their own industry. The third world can only absorb so much inventory especially with flagging economies.

        • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          of course adjustments will be made. but one can’t really say that chinese economy is going to crash when no examples of a 1.5 billion people economic power existed before.

          and lets not forget that when demand rises for ev’s in western economies, considering the production capacity of the chinese market even high tariffs won’t make a dent on their exports. the eu is not ready to supply demand of ev’s by 2035. unless the state invests directly into car manufacturers just like the chinese gov is doing.

          also another thing no one expects is the opening of the 1.5 billion consumer market as a bargaining chip by the chinese gov as a way to consolidate their position on the global market.

          imho, the chinese gov has a lot of market solutions they haven’t used but that can be activated and negotiated in record time.

          edit: just to add their increased car exports are to russia, which is not that good of a consumer market with everything going on there, but it could teach them a lesson on how to corner non western markets. the complexity of the global economy favours the chinese at this point in time. they have more options than the western world.

          • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            China has been dangling their consumer market to Western companies for the last 20 years as a way to encourage investment. It hasn’t turned out well for them and many companies are leaving China. Suddenly reopening already “open markets” is not something the West is going to buy. You only get to pull that trick once.

            The Demographics in China are also terrible. They are no longer the most populous nation on Earth. They are also the fastest aging due to the effects of the 1 child policy. The problem today isn’t that they aren’t running out of babies, they did that 20years ago. The problem is they are running out of 20 something’s to replace the older generations.

            Add this to the issues with debt and the property market implosion and I don’t see China making it through the 2030s without some kind of fundamental government change.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China

              • DdCno1@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                also demographics is way worse in the west

                No. China has a fertility rate of 1.2 right now. That’s worse than the West. EU sits at 1.53, USA 1.64. What’s worse is that this rate has been low for a very long time due to Mao’s One Child Policy.

                • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  yeah but our demographics is helped by immigration theirs isn’t. they still have that window open to use. we don’t.

                  • DdCno1@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    They won’t use it. China is going full-on ethnonationalist right now and is considerably less open to immigration than even in the past.

    • maness300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Debt is a kind of gravity.

      Uh… no. If you pay attention to history, debt can and is wiped away without repercussion.

      Debt is more of a threat, than anything else. If China fails to pay their debts, does the world just stop doing business with China?

      The reason why there’s so much unpaid debt is because the ruling class has convinced workers to sell themselves out. That’s all. It doesn’t actually need to be paid just like college loans. The world would in fact be a better place if it wasn’t paid. The only people who get screwed are investors with more money than you.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure, to some of that - but China’s real estate market is simply vast, at one estimate over 50 trillion dollars’ worth - and individual wealth in China is heavily tied to RE. If that bubble pops, it’s not just the investors who will be up in arms.

      • groupofcrows@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Can you provide some examples where debt was waived away without repercussions?