• ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your question has been asked even in the Roman forum, and even for millennia before. Perhaps there is no solution - perhaps its an integral part of the human condition. But we will never stop searching.

    • SCmSTR@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      There has to be a way for society to function healthily for all, and to disable corruption at the same time. There HAS to… Like, if we can feel when something is bad, we can eventually articulate it, and if we can eventually articulate it, we should be able to design ways to make it better. The society programming will get more and more complex until we figure it out.

      I think knowing what we want is key. And to want, you have to first know. We’ve simultaneously made so much progress in the past 100 years, but also so, so little. The human condition is slow-mode.

      • Pandoras_Can_Opener@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        have you watch cgp Grey’s video called rules for rulers? I think therein lies a lot of answers. the TL;DW version is that rulers need to keep their other top ministers happy lest they revolt. they have no such strong incentive to cater to the common people. I suspect while keeping the ministers happy they engage in either illegal or not entirely legal actions at least once in a while. indeed to rise as a ruler you probably can’t be too moral either.

        so of course they don’t want to take away their tools that help them stay in power. I think the solution lies in what we accept from leaders in terms of amoral conduct. and there’s the conundrum. this needs to be a society wide thing where the vast majority recognize blamrnshifting, gaslighting, moving the goalposts and so on. and don’t accept to be manipulated and lied to that way. most people simply don’t care. and most people also use these exact same manipulation tools in their life as well. which in turn means they don’t want that taken away either.

        that’s essentially exactly what we see play out in reddit too. most people can’t be bothered to act on spez’s selfishness. and the mods who by rights should be bothered cling to hard to their own little fiefdoms of absolute power.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The issue is that power and money corrupt.

        The man in power won’t be giving it up voluntarily. So you join the revolution, and follow a charismatic leader into a civil war. You win and in the end you find out, you have been backing Napoleon and now he’s the one chopping off heads.

        • AdventureSpoon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Napoleon wasnt all that bad of a choice to back though. His decisions did a lot of lasting good.

          Having backed Robespierre though must have made a lot of people feel really silly about themselves.

          • copium@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Napoléon certainly got a lot more people killed than Robespierre.

            He was a military genius but the battle he fought still had a lot of blood from French and other. Millions of dead for nothing but some little man glory.

            Only 30 000 died because of the terror

      • Lells@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not knowing what we want, we all know what we WANT, it’s knowing what we NEED. We WANT to have more than anybody else (More money, more power, more … things)… But it’s not what we NEED. We need food, water, air, a safe place to sleep, love.

        But we instead spend a bunch of time, resources and energy on things we don’t really need, and convince everyone else that THINGS define our worth, that we can only be good if others are worse off. We promote greed and hatred. We APPLAUD that shit and then try to emulate it. It’s not what we need though.

    • letsroll@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The answer that humanity has come up with, which is, of course, imperfect, but the best we seem to be able to do is democracy.

      • Lells@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which only works with an educated and informed base of voters. Which is probably why the people who corrupt all forms of government spend so much effort in making sure we remain ignorant and misinformed.