On April 1, a tax increase on alcohol known as the “beer tax” will come into effect, meaning Canadians may soon pay more for their beverage of choice.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sorry - Beer is our “Beverage of Choice”? Pretty sure we drink more tea than beer and more coffee than tea… and more than either that sweet sweet water.

    I don’t even particularly associate Canadian culture with beer, we make some darn fine ones but Cider tends to dominate our alcohol culture (or maybe Fireball).

    What a weird call for empathy.

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      I assume they meant alcoholic beverage of choice.

      Also, while beer has been losing market share since around 2008, it remains the most popular alcoholic beverage nationwide, as well as being the most popular for every province except BC and Québec (who both prefer wine).

      “Ciders, coolers, and other refreshment beverages” account for only around 10% of the market share, behind beer, wine, and spirits, so I’m not sure where you get the idea that cider is the most popular alcoholic drink.

  • Two2Tango@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I hope their goal is to help me quit drinking. In which case it’s great for me, but RIP small craft brewers

  • Formes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    You know what is amazing: They can index taxes to inflation, but they can’t be damned to index minimum wage to the cost of living increase.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t need to do anything to index percentages of sales prices to inflation, when inflation results in increases in sales prices.

      Raising the tax rate is not indexing taxes to anything.

    • bjorney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If you are looking to save money, take the fraction of a cent price increase in stride

      Signed: guy who has spent thousands of dollars on home brewing equipment

      • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Depends on the volume you drink. If you can save a buck a beer and drink 2-3 tallboys a day you could offset the cost of the gear in a year.

        • bjorney@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, but that is also contingent on you placing absolutely zero value on your time.

          An absolute bottom of the barrel recipe (10lb 2 row, 1lb c-10, 1oz hallertau, s-04) will run you about $30-40 per 20L batch. So after you spend hundreds of dollars on equipment, you are only saving like $40 per 10 hours spent brewing

          • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            placing absolutely zero value on your time

            I see you’ve met my boss!

            Is it 10 active hours or a 10 hour period during which you nanny an ongoing process? I started turning 2 days a month into bread baking/meat smoking/laundry day. Each job only needs an hour each of active time but spread out over 4-6hrs. I could totally squeeze in an additional project…

            • bjorney@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Brew day is ~8 hours, I would say it’s half nannying, there’s usually 2 hours where you can full on walk away, but the rest is either active cleaning or you have to press a button or stir a thing every 10 minutes so you are glued to your pot

              Bottling is another ~2 hours or so (sanitizing bottles and capping them, cleaning the used fermenter) - you can cut this down to half an hour if you forego bottling, but that’s another $1500 in capital costs for kegging equipment

              • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Hmm, that would be a big jump in the workload but it would fit with the twice a month schedule. I’ll have to take some time before I grok this problem.

            • Kichae@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Oh no, your boss values your time very highly. They just want to keep all of that value for themself.

          • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            I know, Maybe if we had proper healthcare, and a government that works for it’s people instead of corporations, Canadians wouldn’t have to kill themselves just to sleep at night.

  • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Where else are we supposed to generate tax income? Surely the dry husk of the working class has more to squeeze out of!

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Unpopular opinion - good. It’s a known carcinogen. Add onto that the social issues it can cause and I think it makes some sense to tax it more that other things to bring in those external costs that were being “passed on” to society in the form of healthcare and social services.

  • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m mixed on this one.

    As a detterrent to drinking, great. Fuck alcohol.

    As a serious source of taxation, I hate any sort of tax that disproportionally burdens the poorer members of society.