Can someone who isn’t banned on Reddit post the clip of their boy Biden answering their exact fucking question.

      • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Your, honor. Listen. I know you saw a lot of “sussy wussy” images presented by the prosecution but the thing you’re missing is context, ok?”

        “Were the pornographic images you possessed of children, yes or no?”

        “Ok, so, the age of consent is more of a modern idea, and throughou-”

        “Yes or no, Mr. Kochinski.”

        “It’s complicated, ok? I was looking up-”

        “Please put in the record that the defendant attempted to debate the court in a pedophilic manner.”

        Someone should find out how much the Tacoma police/DA require as a bribe to make this reality.

        • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 months ago

          Your honor, the prosecution is clip chimping, thus making their clips inadmissible as evidence in a court of law.

      • GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        “That context being?”

        Try watching the whole stream.” smuglord (the entire 3-4 hour stream just to get the supposedly missing context for this one statement, only to find out I was bullshitting you and covering my streamer-daddy’s ass)

  • envis10n [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    My god this discourse is exhausting. It’s really fucking cut and dry. Every single time I see people crying about context in this situation, the context isn’t missing or makes it worse than without. How are people still okay with this shit?